THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH, THE DISCIPLINARY POWER AND THE REASONABLE TERM: A critical analysis of the doctrine of the solicitor of the treasury of the nation on the unconstitutionality of article 38 of the public employment law
Keywords:
Summaries, Administrative law, Constitutional law, Reasonable period, Solicitor of the TreasuryAbstract
This article makes a critical analysis of the Solicitor of the Treasury’s doctrine -held since 2002- concerning the unconstitutionality of the article 38 of the Public Employment Act which establishes that administrative summaries must be conducted within six months. It is not intended to defend the reasonableness of that period, but to demonstrate that the Solicitor of the Treasury’s decisions regarding this issue suffer from several shortcomings which make its subsequent decisions invalid. One of the main assumptions of this interpretation will be specially refuted: the fact that the executive power has the ability to not to fulfill a Law because it is considered as unconstitutional.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
La publicación del artículo implica la donación de los derechos de autor a la Facultad de Derecho, conservando el autor su derecho a utilizar el artículo en publicaciones de su autoría o páginas web referidas a su trayectoria. Para el caso de otro tipo de publicaciones, antes de su utilización, deberá obtener autorización de la facultad.
