THE SYSTEMATIC LOCATION OF SELF-DEFENSE ACCORDING TO THE PERSPECTIVE OF RADICAL FUNCTIONALISM: CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE OBJECTIONS FORMULATED BY OMAR PALERMO TO THE APPROACH OF GÜNTHER JAKOBS
Keywords:
Radical functionalism, Illegitimate aggression, Legitimate defense, Objective imputationAbstract
In radical functionalism, Günther Jakobs presents self-defense as a cause of justification, considering that defensive action is typical but not unlawful. Omar Palermo, taking his reasoning, criticizes him and affirms that he must have concluded that it is a cause of atypicality. This work exposes the two positions and the motives that guarantee that the defensive action creates a typical risk and that your injury should not be objectively attributable to the scope of the aggressor-victim. Illegitimate aggression and defensive action must be legally assessed in their respective fields of competence. In this sense, although the omission of the duty of rescue by the aggressor is true, it ceases to be guarantor in the face of the defensive reaction
and opens the way to the duty of tolerance.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
La publicación del artículo implica la donación de los derechos de autor a la Facultad de Derecho, conservando el autor su derecho a utilizar el artículo en publicaciones de su autoría o páginas web referidas a su trayectoria. Para el caso de otro tipo de publicaciones, antes de su utilización, deberá obtener autorización de la facultad.
