Epistemic colonization
www.revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/revistaEF
REVISTA DE ENSEÑANZA DE LA FÍSICA, Vol. 33, no. 2 (2021) 345
At this point, we must stick to the fact that it was the change in the European economic system and the growing
need for market expansion that forced, in a way, the search for new routes to the East, a fact that resulted in the arrival
in America in 1492, or as it was called prior to the colonization process, in Abya Yala. According to the story told and
reproduced in the southern part of the American continent, Europeans “discovered” America by chance. Now, this
chance culminated in discovery not only geographically, but also with regard to the production and supply of raw
material for the parent companies to produce consumer goods and return them to their consumer market. Therefore,
a new story begins that of modern colonization.
In this sense, the appropriation by Europeans of lands on the American continent – highlighting its three parts here
– was based on what Walsh and Mignolo (2018) and Quijano (1992, 2019) define as a colonial matrix of power. This
matrix is constituted, in a way, by the set of social, economic, psychological and political procedures used to dominate
a territory that was already dominated, that is, to colonize a space that was already occupied by other social groups:
those called by 15th-century literature of indigenous peoples. In this way, from the colonial matrix of power, we can
understand the process through which the peoples of the Americas were subjugated to the power of the white
Europeans. Thus, we can say corroborating Quijano (1992, 2019) that there would be no modern Europe without the
possession of the Americas in the 15th century.
So, there is a second concept allied to that of colonization, which is indicated by coloniality. According to Walsh and
Mignolo (2018), Quijano (1992, 2019), colonization allowed white Europeans to constitute a new Western Europe in
the 15th century, Europe seen as modern, which would develop and would be focused on its mercantile expansion. In
this way, the same author's orient towards the coloniality/modernity dyad. Thus, this dyad concerns the colonial power
matrix and is sustained by the exploration of new territories and the need to produce raw materials for metropolitan
power.
In this way, the European colonialism that emerged in the 15th century and that took place between the end of
the 18th century and the beginning of the 19th was replaced by coloniality, which is the result of a second economic
process initiated with imperialism. Also, according to Quijano (1992, 2019) coloniality is a neologism, like modernity
that originates from the word modern. Thus, this neologism indicates that, after the colonization process, colonial
characteristics still remain, albeit in a culturally intensified way.
However, to explore new territories, which were already occupied by large populations, even forming empires such
as the Aztecs, Mayans and Incas, in Central and South America, it was necessary to use military and political forces, as
well as ideological and psychological forces. Furthermore, this process assumed the labor force as capital as its power
supply. This means that from the need to explore new worlds, the workforce became essential for the maintenance of
power, as well as for obtaining raw materials and managing markets by the metropolitan power. Coloniality operates
through ideological force, and this maintains current markets.
Thus, another essential feature with regard to coloniality/modernity is the fact that it determines a new
configuration of Western society, understood as globalization. The aspects that highlight the globalization of the
colonial era are: (i) the scientific and religious justification of the notion of race and (ii) the hierarchical categories of
ethnicity. Thus, colonization was not only related to the use of force, but also to the psychological and epistemic. In
what refers to psychological colonization, we understand the insertion of values and beliefs linked to another culture
over another, for example, the catechization promoted by the Jesuit Order in Brazil in social groups called Missions
during the 16th and 17th centuries. Once a set defined as a pattern of behavior is established, the subject's psychology
is altered, starting to re-signify itself as such.
For more than three hundred years in South America, millions of people were subjugated by the fact that they were
black and, under the justification of Christian Europe, were exempt from soul and humanity. At this point, it
corroborates Quijano's (2019) view that coloniality was only possible through the operation of two central axes: (i) the
codification of the difference between conquerors and conquered in the idea of race and (ii) the constitution of a new
structure of power control and its resources and products.
As for Abdi (2012), the colonizing project deprives the individual of his humanity, guaranteeing the colonizer to
appropriate his psyche and configure cultural patterns that are perpetuated over generations. However, this colonial
movement promoted crises in its own structure, causing resistance to arise from those who subjugated themselves
and experience, even in the 21st century, colonizing, epistemological and ontological influences. Walsh and Mignolo
(2018) and Quijano (1992, 2019) define this movement of resistance to the colonizing movement by decoloniality. In
this sense, the decolonial movement is a call to the very existence of those who have always lived overshadowed by
the power relations established by the colonizers.
Educational training is the operator through which the set of standards, beliefs and values of a society are
transmitted, reproduced and transformed within a defined physical space within a considered period. In this
mechanism, the standards, values and beliefs are periodically revisited and define both the psychological and
ontological bases of the subjects belonging to the group. In this way, there is the production of historicity by these
individuals through what we call culture.