Debates parlamentarios. Modos de acción retórica institucionalizada para la adopción de decisiones colectivas
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
En los sistemas de gobierno parlamentario, la lucha por el poder político se despliega ampliamente en la política intra e interpartidaria. Los debates parlamentarios constituyen prácticas institucionalmente ratificadas de deliberación política multipartidista a través del diálogo- a favor y en contra -de los representantes de los ciudadanos elegidos democráticamene.Tomando como casos de estudio los parlamentos británico y de algunos países europeos, en este artículo se esbozan, ilustran y examinan las siguientes cuestiones principales relacionadas con los debates parlamentarios: prácticas de deliberación, el género y subgéneros del discurso parlamentario, destinatarios y públicos, funciones de los representantes, temas clave en los debates.
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista, aceptan los siguientes términos de la política de derechos de autor:- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor (esto incluye el copyrigth) y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons: No se permite un uso comercial de la obra original ni de las posibles obras derivadas, la distribución de las cuales se debe hacer con una licencia igual a la que regula la obra original.
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: situarlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarla en un libro) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en repositorios institucionales o en su página web) luego del proceso de publicación, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
Cómo citar
Referencias
Ås, B, 1978, Hersketeknikker [Master suppression techniques], Kjerringråd, Bern.
Atanga, L L, 2009, Gender, discourse and power in the Cameroonian Parliament, RPCIG, Langaa. Bächtiger, A, 2014, ‘Debate and deliberation in legislatures’, in The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies, eds., S Martin, T Saalfeld, & K W Strøm, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Bates, Stephen R., Kerr, Peter, Byrne, Christopher & Stanley, Liam, 2012. ‘Questions to the Prime Minister: A comparative study of PMQs from Thatcher to Cameron’, Parliamentary Affairs 2, p.1–28.
Bayley, P, ed., 2004, Cross-cultural perspectives on parliamentary discourse, John Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia.
Bevitori C, 2004, ‘Negotiating conflict: Interruptions in British and Italian parliamentary debates’, in Cross- cultural perspectives on parliamentary discourse, ed. P Bayley, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 87–109. Bruteig, Y M, 2010, ‘Czech parliamentary discourse: Parliamentary interactions and the construction of the addressee’, in European Parliaments under scrutiny: Discourse strategies and interaction practices, ed. C. Ilie, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 265–302.
Bull, P & Wells, P, 2012, ‘Adversarial discourse in Prime Minister’s Questions’, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31(1), pp. 30–48.
Burkhardt, A, 2004, Zwischen Monolog und Dialog. Zur Theorie, Typologie und Geschichte des Zwischenrufs im Deutschen Parlamentarismus, Niemeyer, Tübingen.
Carbó, T, 1992, Towards an interpretation of interruptions in Mexican parliamentary discourse. Discourse &Society, 3(1), pp. 25–45.
Chappell, L, 2002. Gendering government: Feminist engagement with the state in Australia and Canada. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver.
Chester, D N & Bowring, N, 1962, Questions in parliament. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Formato, F, 2014, Language use and gender in the Italian Parliament. PhD thesis, Department of Linguistics and English Language, Lancaster University.
Franklin, M & Norton, P, eds., 1993, Parliamentary questions. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Gallagher, M, Laver, M & Mair, P, 2011, Representative government in modern Europe, McGraw- Hill, London.
Goffman, E, 1981, Forms of talk, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia. Habermas, J, 1995, Between facts and norms, MIT press, Cambridge, MA.
Harris, S, 2001, ‘Being politically impolite: Extending politeness theory to adversarial political discourse’, Discourse & Society 12(4), pp. 451–472.
Hix, S, Noury, A & Roland, G, 2007, Democratic politics in the European Parliament. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Ihalainen, P, Ilie, C & Palonen, K, 2016, Parliament and parliamentarism: A comparative history of disputes about a European concept. Berghahn Books, Oxford and New York.
Ilie, C, 2000, ‘Cliché-based metadiscursive argumentation in the Houses of Parliament’, International Journal of Applied Linguistics 10(1), pp .65–84.
Ilie, C, 2001, ‘Unparliamentary language: Insults as cognitive forms of confrontation’, in Language and ideology, Vol. II: Descriptive cognitive approaches, eds. R. Dirven, R. Frank & C. Ili, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 235–263.
Ilie, C, 2003a, ‘Discourse and metadiscourse in parliamentary debates’, Journal of Language and Politics, 1(2), pp. 269–291.
Ilie, C, 2003b, Parenthetically speaking: Parliamentary parentheticals as rhetorical strategies, in Dialogue
Analysis 2000: Selected papers from the 10th IADA Anniversary Conference, Bologna 2000, eds. M Bondi & S Stati, Niemeyer, Tübingen, pp. 253–264.
Ilie, C, 2003c, ‘Histrionic and agonistic features of parliamentary discourse’, Studies in Communication Sciences, 3(1), pp. 25–53.
Ilie, C, 2004, ‘Insulting as (un)parliamentary practice in the British and Swedish Parliaments: A rhetorical approach’, in Cross-cultural perspectives on parliamentary discourse, ed. P Bayley, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 45–86.
Ilie, C, 2005, ‘Interruption patterns in British parliamentary debates and drama dialogue’, in Dialogue Analysis IX: Dialogue in Literature and the Media. Selected Papers from the 9th IADA Conference, Salzburg 2003, eds. A Betten & M Dannerer, Niemeyer, Tübingen, pp. 415–430.
Ilie, C, 2010a, ‘Strategic uses of parliamentary forms of address: The case of the U.K. Parliament and the Swedish Riksdag’, Journal of Pragmatics 42(4), pp. 885–911.
Ilie, C, 2010b, ‘Identity co-construction in parliamentary discourse practices’, in European parliaments under scrutiny: Discourse strategies and interaction practices, ed. C. Ilie, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 57– 78.
Ilie, C, ed., 2010c, European parliaments under scrutiny: Discourse strategies and interaction practices, Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Ilie, C, 2010d, ‘Managing dissent and maximising interpersonal relations in parliamentary discourse’ in European parliaments under scrutiny: Discourse strategies and interaction practices, ed. C Ilie, John Benjamins, pp. 193–221, Amsterdam.
Ilie, C, 2013, ‘Gendering confrontational rhetoric: Discursive disorder in the British and Swedish parliaments’, Democratization, vol. 20(3), pp. 501–521.
Ilie, C, 2015, ‘Follow-ups as multifunctional questioning and answering strategies in Prime Minister’s Questions’, in The dynamics of political discourse: Forms and functions of follow-ups, eds. A Fetzer, E Weizman & L Berlin, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 195–218.
Ilie, C, 2016, ‘Parliamentary discourse and deliberative rhetoric’, in Parliaments and parliamentarism: A comparative history of disputes about a European concept, eds. P Ihalainen, C Ilie & K Palonen, pp. 133– 145. Berghahn Books, Oxford and New York.
Ilie, C & Ornatowski, C, 2016, ‘Central and Eastern European parliamentary rhetoric since the nineteenth century: The case of Romania and Poland’ in Parliaments and parliamentarism: A comparative history of disputes about a European concept, P Ihalainen, C Ilie & K Palonen, Berghahn Books, Oxford and New York, pp. 192–215.
Inter-Parliamentary Union, 2006, Parliament and democracy in the twenty-first century: A guide to good practice, Geneva, Le Grand Saconnex.
Katz, R A & Wessels, B, 1999, European Parliament, the national parliaments and European integration, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Kreppel, A, 2002, The European Parliament and the supranational power system: A study of institutional development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Lovenduski, J, 2012, ‘Prime Minister’s Questions as political ritual’, British Politics 7(4), pp. 314–340. Lovenduski, J & Azza K, 2005, ‘Women in parliament: Making a difference’, in Women in parliament: Beyond numbers, eds. J Ballington & A Karam, IDEA, Stockholm.
Macaulay, T B, 2005 (1860), Miscellaneous essays and lays of ancient Rome, Cosimo Inc, New York. Mamadouh, V & Raunio, T, 2003, The committee system: Powers, appointments and report allocation, Journal of Common Market Studies 41(2), p. 333–351.
Marques, M A, 2010, ‘The public and private sphere in parliamentary debate: The construction of the addresser in the Portuguese parliament’, in European parliaments under scrutiny: Discourse strategies and interaction practices, ed. C Ilie, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 265–302.
Martín Rojo, L, 2000, ‘Spain, outer wall of the European fortress: analysis of parliamentary debates on immigration policy in Spain’, in Racism at the top: parliamentary discourses on ethnic issues in six European states, eds. R Wodak & T van Dijk, Drava Verlag,Klagenfurt, Austria, ch. 6.
Morgan, R & Tame, C, eds., 1996, Parliaments and parties: The European Parliament in the political life of Europe. Macmillan, London.
Müller, W C & Saalfeld, T, eds., 1997, Members of parliament in Western Europe: Roles and behaviour, Frank Cass, London.
Ornatowski, C, 2010, ‘Parliamentary discourse and political transition: Polish parliament after 1989’ in European Parliaments under scrutiny: Discourse strategies and interaction practices, ed. C Ilie, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 223–264.
Pérez de Ayala, S, 2001, ‘FTAs and Erskine May: Conflicting needs? – Politeness in Question Time’, Journal of Pragmatics 33, pp. 143–169.
Proksch, S-O & Slapin, J B, 2015, The politics of parliamentary debate: Parties, rebels and representation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Rasiah, P, 2010, ‘A framework for the systematic analysis of evasion in parliamentary discourse, Journal of Pragmatics 42, pp. 664–680.
Raunio, T, 1996, ‘Parliamentary questions in the European Parliament: Representation, information and control’, Journal of Legislative Studies 2(4), pp. 356–382.
Roald, V & Sangolt, L, 2011, Deliberation, rhetoric and emotion in the discourse of climate change in the European Parliament, Eburon Academic Publishers, Delft.
Rogers, R & Walters, R, 2006, How Parliament works, 6th ed., Routledge, Oxford.
Ross, K, 1995, ‘Gender and party politics – how the press reported the Labour leadership campaign, 1994’, Media, Culture & Society 17(3), pp. 499–509.
Sánchez de Dios, M & Wiberg, M, 2012, ‘Questioning in European parliaments’, in The roles and function of parliamentary questions, eds. S Martin & O Rozenberg, Routledge, Oxford, pp. 96– 109.
Shaw, S, 2002, Language and gender in political debates in the House of Commons, PhD thesis (unpublished), The Institute of Education, University of London.
Shirin, R, 2010, ‘Ceremony and ritual in parliament’, The Journal of Legislative Studies 16(3), pp. 281–297. Steinmetz, W, 2002, ‘A code of its own: Rhetoric and logic of parliamentary debate in modern Britain’, Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought 6, LIT Verlag, Münster, pp 84–104.
ter Wal, J, 2000, ‘Comparing argumentation and counter-argumentation in Italian parliamentary debate on immigration’, in The semiotics of racism, eds. M Reisigl & R Wodak, Passagen Verlag, Vienna, pp. 129–154.
Tsakona, V, 2011, ‘Irony beyond criticism: Evidence from Greek parliamentary discourse’, Pragmatics and Society 2(1), pp. 57–86.
Tsakona, V, 2013, ‘Parliamentary punning: Is the opposition more humorous than the ruling party?’ European Journal of Humour Research 1(2), pp. 101–111.
van der Valk, I, 2000, ‘Parliamentary discourse on immigration and nationality in France’, in Racism at the top: parliamentary discourses on ethnic issues in six European states, eds. R Wodak & T van Dijk, Drava Verlag, Klagenfurt, Austria: ch. 7.
Walsh, C, 2013, Gender and discourse: Language and power in politics, the church and organisations, Routledge, London and New York.
Wiberg, M, 1995, ‘Parliamentary questioning. Control by communication?, in Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe, ed. H Döring, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt, pp. 179–222.
Wodak, R, 2003, ‘Multiple identities: The roles of female parliamentarians in the EU parliament’, The handbook of language and gender, eds. in J Holmes & M Meyerhoff, pp. 671–698, Blackwell, Oxford.
Wodak, R, 2011, The discourse of politics in action: Politics as usual, 2nd ed., Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Wodak, R & van Dijk, T A, eds., 2000, Racism at the top. Parliamentary discourses on ethnic issues in six European states, Drava Verlag, Klagenfurt, Austria.
Zima, E, Brône, G & Feyaerts, K, 2010, ‘Patterns of interaction in Austrian parliamentary debates. The pragmasemantics of interruptive comments’, in European Parliaments under scrutiny: Discourse strategies and interaction practices, ed. C Ilie, pp. 135–164. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.