The tribe Potentilleae (Rosaceae- Rosoideae) in Argentina

Authors

  • Marta E. Departamento de Biología, Cátedra de Anatomía Vegetal, FCN-UNT. San Miguel de Tucumán. Tucumán. Argentina; Cátedra de Biología Vegetal, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Catamarca (UNCa). Catamarca, Argentina.
  • Silvia E. Gómez Romero Departamento de Biología, Cátedra de Diversidad Vegetal III. FCN-UNT. Miguel Lillo 205. 4000 San Miguel de Tucumán. Tucumán. Argentina
  • Griselda Podazza Área Biología Integrativa. Fundación Miguel Lillo. Miguel Lillo 251. 4000 San Miguel de Tucumán. Tucumán. Argentina.
  • Ana Catalina Luque Departamento de Biología, Cátedra de Anatomía Vegetal, FCN-UNT. Miguel Lillo 205. 4000 San Miguel de Tucumán. Tucumán. Argentina. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7905-6397
  • Mario Alberto Debes Departamento de Biología, Cátedra de Anatomía Vegetal, FCN-UNT. Miguel Lillo 205. 4000 San Miguel de Tucumán. Tucumán. Argentina; Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas (INSIBIO, CONICET-UNT). Chacabuco 461. 4000 San Miguel de Tucumán. Tucumán. Argentina.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31055/1851.2372.v56.n3.33186

Keywords:

Argentina, Duchesnea, Fragaria, Potentilla, Potentilleae

Abstract

Background and aims: The taxonomic location of the Potentilleae tribe species in Argentina was highly controversial and intensely debated by various authors, in such a way that some merged genera, while others recognized them as valid taxonomic entities. These conflicts show the need for an updated taxonomic treatment. The objective of this work is to present an updated taxonomic synopsis of the Potentilleae in Argentina.

M&M: Taxonomic data from the literature were collected, including phylogenetic studies, and specimens of the Potentilleae tribe of Argentine and foreign herbaria were analyzed; in addition to material collected in the field.

Results and Conclusions: In Argentina, 3 genera with 5 species and 2 forms were recognized for the Potentilleae tribe, differing in a dichotomous key by vegetative, floral and carpological characters. The name of the authors of a species was legitimized and a form was lectotypified. The distribution of one species was broadened and the presence of another was rectified. The Potentilleae inhabit trails, pastures, herbaceous stratum of the Yungas, in open spaces and at elevations from 600-2600 meters above sea level. They grow in riparian environments and in abandoned crops.

References

ARIAS, M., P. ALBORNOZ, J. C. DÍAZ RICCI, A. P. CASTAGNARO & D. S. KIRSCHBAUM. 1998. Collection and characterization of native and naturalized germplasm of Fragaria and related genera Potentilla and Duchesnea in Argentina for its introduction to strawberry breeding programs. In Proceedings of the Natural Resources Forum 98, June 9 and 10, Gainesville, Fla. Center for Natural Resources. Institute of Food and Agriculture, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fl.

ARIAS, M. E. 2007. Frutillas silvestres y especies relacionadas con la cultivada. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Tucumán, Argentina.

CABRERA, A. L. 1976. Regiones Fitogeográficas Argentinas. ACME Ed., Buenos Aires. CASTAGNARO, A., J. C. DÍAZ RICCI, M. ARIAS & P. Albornoz. 1998. A new shoutherm hemisphere species of Potentilla (Rosaceae). Novon 8: 333-336.

DARROW, G. M. 1966. The Strawberry: History, breeding and physiology. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1st edition. New York, EE.UU.

DEBES, M. A., I. ORCE, A. C. LUQUE, J. C. DÍAZ RICCI, A. P. CASTAGNARO & M. ARIAS. 2018. First report of Duchesnea indica f. albocaput (Rosaceae) in northwestern Argentina. Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. 53: 83-91.

DOBES, C. & J.PAULE. 2010. A comprehensive chloroplast DNA-based phylogeny of the genus Potentilla (Rosaceae): Implications for its geographic origin, phylogeography and generic circumscription. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 56: 156–175

ERIKSSON, T., M. S. HIBBS, A. D. YODER, C. F. DELWICHE & M. J. DONOGHUE. 2003. The phylogeny of Rosoideae (Rosaceae) based on sequences of the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA and the TRNL/F region of chloroplast DNA. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164: 197– 211. https://doi.org/10.1086/346163

FAGHIR, M. B., S. POUREBRAHIM & F. ATTAR. 2018. Morphological phylogenetic analysis of the genera Fragaria and Duchesnea in Iran. Rostaniha 19:154-164. https://doi.org/10.22092/BOTANY.2019.124400.1134

FOCKE, W. O.1888. Rosaceae. En: ENGLER, A. & K. PRANTL (eds.) Nat. Pflanzenfamilien 3: 1-61.

GADELLA, TH. W. J. & E. KLIPHUIS. 1963. Chromosome numbers of flowering plants in the Netherlands. Acta Bot. Neerl. 12: 195-230.

GRONDONA, E. 1984. Rosaceae. En: CORREA, M. N (ed.). Fl. Patagónica 8: 48-88. INTA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

HANCOCK, J., A. LAVÍN & J. RETAMALES. 1999. Our southern strawberry heritage: Fragaria chiloensis of Chile. Hortscience 34: 814-816.

HARA, H. & S. KUROSAWA. 1959. On the Duchesnea indicagroup. J. Jpn. Bot. 34: 161-166.

HUMMER, K. E. & J. JANICK. 2009. Rosaceae: taxonomy, economic importance, genomics. En: Genetics and genomics of Rosaceae, pp. 1-17.Springer, New York, NY.

HUTCHINSON, J. 1964. The genera of flowering plants. Vol 1. Dicotyledons. Clarendon, Oxford.

ICHIJIMA, K. 1926. Cytological and genetic studies on Fragaria. Genetics 11: 590- 604.

IWATSUBO, Y. & N. NARUHASHI. 1988. Karyotypes of three species of Fragaria (Rosaceae). Cytologia 54: 493-497.

JUDD, W. S., C. S. CAMPBELL, E. A. KELLOG & P. F. STEVENS. 2007. Plant Systematics: A phylogenetic approach. Sinauer Associates, Inc. Sunderland, MA.

KALKMAN, C. 1968. Potentilla, Duchesnea and Fragaria in Malaysia (Rosaceae). Blumea 16: 325 – 354.

KALKMAN, C. 2004. Rosaceae. In: KUBITZKI, K. (ed.), The families and genera of vascular plants, vol. 6, Flowering plants - Dicotyledons: Celastrales, Oxalidales, Rosales, Cornales, Ericales, pp. 343-386. Springer, Berlin.

LUQUE, A. C., M. A. DEBES, M. F. PERERA, A. P. CASTAGNARO & M. E. ARIAS. 2019. Reproductive compatibility studies between wild and cultivated strawberries (Fragaria × ananassa) to obtain “bridge species” for breeding programmes. Plant Breeding 138: 229-238. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12681

MABBERLEY, D. J. 2002. Potentilla and Fragaria (Rosaceae) reunited. Telopea 9: 793 - 801.

MITICH, L.W. 1995. Cinquefoils (Potentilla spp.) The five finger weeds. Weed Technology 9 (4): 659-882. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890037X00024337

NARUHASHI, N. 1992. Duchesnea indica f. albocaput. J. Phytogeogr. Tax. 40: 2-131

NOVARA, L. J. 1993. Rosaceae Juss. En: NOVARA, L. J. (ed.), Flora del Valle de Lerma. Aportes Bot. Salta, Sér. Fl. 2: 34 - 35.

ONTIVERO, M., M. ARIAS, J. C. DÍAZ RICCI, J. BABOT, P. ALBORNOZ & A. P. CASTAGNARO. 2000. Analysis of genetic similarities among species of Fragaria, Potentilla, and Duchesnea growing in the northwest of Argentina by using morphological, anatomical and characters. Canad. J. Bot. 78: 547 - 556. https://doi.org/10.1139/b00-026

PARODI, L. R. 1978. Enciclopedia Argentina de Agricultura y Jardinería 1 - II. 2da parte. Ed ACME. Buenos Aires, Argentina.

POTTER, D., T. ERIKSSON, R. C. EVANS, S. H. OH, J. E. E. SMEDMARK, D. R. MORGAN, M. Kerr, K. R. ROBERTSON, M. ARSENAULT, T. A. DICKINSON & C. S. CAMPBELL. 2007. Phylogeny and classification of Rosaceae. Plant Syst. Evol. 266: 5-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-007-0539-9

SCARPA, G. F. & C. N. ROSSO. 2019. Etnobotánica histórica de grupos Criollos de Argentina IV: Identificación taxonómica de las plantas y análisis de datos medicinales del Chaco Húmedo provenientes de la Encuesta Nacional de Folklore de 1921. Bonplandia 28: 5-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.30972/bon.2813572

SCHULZE-MENZ, G. K. 1964. Rosales. In: A. Engler’s Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. 12th ed. f.88. Gebr. Borntraeger, pp. 213-216. Berlín, Alemania.

SMITH, J. E. 1811. A description of Duchesnea fragiforms, constituting a new genus of the natural order of senticosae of Linnaus, Rosaceae of Jussieu. Trans Linn. Soc. London 10: 371-374.

SOJÁK, J., 2008. Notes on Potentila XXI. A new division of the tribe Potentilleae (Rosaceae) and notes on generic delimitations. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 127: 349–358.

STAUDT, G. 1962. Taxonomic studies on the genus Fragaria, typification of Fragaria species known at the time of Linnaeus. Can. J. Bot.40: 212-218.

STAUDT, G. 1989: The species of Fragaria, their taxonomy and geographical distribution. Acta Hortic. 265: 23-34. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1989.265.1

STAUDT, G. 1999. Systemetic and geographic distribution of the American strawberry species. Taxonomic studies in the genus Fragaria. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 81: 1-162.

STAUDT, G. 2008. Strawberry biogeography. Genetics and systematic. Acta Hortic. 842: 71-83. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.842.1

TAKHTAJAN, A. 1997. Diversity and Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia University Press, New York.

THIERS, B. 2020, continuously updated. Index Herbariorum: a global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium [online]. Disponible en: http://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih. [Acceso: 6 de agosto 2020]

TRONCOSO, N. S. 1987. Rosáceas. Fl. IL. Entre Ríos, Colecc. Ci. Inst. Nac. Tecnol. Agropecu. 6: 436 – 438.

ZARDINI, E. M. 1973. Los géneros de Rosaceas espontáneos en la República Argentina. Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. 15: 209 - 228.

ZARDINI, E. M. 1999. Rosaceae. En: ZULOAGA, F. O. & O. Morrone (eds.). Catálogo de las plantas vasculares en la República Argentina, vol. II, [online]. Disponible en: http://www.darwin.edu.ar/Proyectos/FloraArgentina/Generos.asp?Letra=P. [Acceso:16/V/2019]

Published

2021-09-07

Issue

Section

Vascular Plants

How to Cite

“The Tribe Potentilleae (Rosaceae- Rosoideae) in Argentina”. 2021. Boletín De La Sociedad Argentina De Botánica (Journal of the Argentine Botanical Society 56 (3). https://doi.org/10.31055/1851.2372.v56.n3.33186.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 467

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.