MISINTERPRETATION OF HISTOMORPHOLOGICAL CRITERIA IN APOPTOSIS AND SIGNIFICANCE OF IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31051/1852.8023.v13.n1.32020

Keywords:

letter

Abstract

-

References

Adamkov M. 2020. Apoptosis and antiapoptotic protein survivin as promising tumor biomarker. 1st ed. Germany: Rank. 156 p.

D´Arcy MS. 2019. Cell death: a review of the major forms of apoptosis, necrosis and autophagy. Cell Biol Int. 43: 582-92.

Elmore S. 2007. Apoptosis: A review of programmed cell death. Toxicologic Pathology. 35: 495-516.

Galluzzi L, Bravo-San Pedro JM, Vitale I, Aaronson SA, Abrams JM, Adam D, Alnemri ES, Altucci L, et al. 2015. Essential versus accessory aspects of cell death: recommendations of the NCCD 2015. Cell Death and Differentiation. 22: 58-73.

Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Aaronson SA, Abrams JM, Adam D, Agostinis P, Alnemri ES, Altucci L, et al. 2018. Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018. Cell Death & Differentiation. 25: 486-541. doi:10.1038/s41418-017-0012-4

Voss AK, Strasser A. 2020. The essentials of developmental apoptosis [version 1; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research. 9(148). https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.21571.1

Downloads

Published

2021-03-21

Issue

Section

Letters to the Editor

How to Cite

MISINTERPRETATION OF HISTOMORPHOLOGICAL CRITERIA IN APOPTOSIS AND SIGNIFICANCE OF IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY. (2021). Revista Argentina De Anatomía Clínica (Argentine Journal of Clinical Anatomy), 13(1), 31-32. https://doi.org/10.31051/1852.8023.v13.n1.32020