Método multicriterio cardinal de decisión en grupo con alternativas clasificadas por categorías

Authors

  • José Francisco Zanazzi Laboratorio de Ingeniería y Mantenimiento Industrial (LIMI). Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales – Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
  • Catalina L. Alberto Facultad de Ciencias Económicas–Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Económicas, CIECS UNC-CONICET

Keywords:

multi-criteria analysis for decision making, group decision making, evaluation by categories, group pressure, group learning

Abstract

This article studies the problem of making decisions with a multi-criteria approach, in groups whose members share objectives. These processes offer several advantages: collaborative learning, convergence of priorities and behaviors, higher level of commitment to agreed actions. On the other hand, these exercises require time and can be tedious when decisions are made systematically and with high frequency. There are also drawbacks to be overcome, because these processes can be affected by group pressure, which inhibits individual contributions and makes it difficult to build commitments, or by disturbances in the available information (imprecision, uncertainty or lack of some data). For this reason, the paper presents a method that structures the problem with subjective criteria and a set of categories that facilitate its evaluation. Priorities and preferences are represented by cardinal utilities. The proposal includes procedures aimed at reducing peer pressure, disruption and time required. The work includes an application to the treatment of nonconformities, in a productive process. Among the conclusions, the following stand out: the participants adopted the methodology without inconveniences and they were able to agree on the categories. In addition, they agreed that the proposal allows for a significant reduction in analysis times.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ACKERMANN F. (2012): PROBLEM STRUCTURING METHODS ‘IN THE DOCK’: ARGUING THE CASE FOR SOFT OR. European Journal of Operational Research 219(3):652–658.

BROCKLESBY J. (2016): THE WHAT, THE WHY AND THE HOW OF BEHAVIOURAL OPERATIONAL RESEARCH AN INVITATION TO POTENTIAL SCEPTICS. European Journal of OR. 249(3):796–805.

DIAS, L. C., ANTUNES, C. H., DANTAS, G., DE CASTRO, N., & ZAMBONI, L. (2018): A MULTI-CRITERIA APPROACH TO SORT AND RANK POLICIES BASED ON DELPHI QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENTS AND ELECTRE TRI: THE CASE OF SMART GRIDS IN BRAZIL. Omega, 76, 100-111.

DEL MORAL, M. J., CHICLANA, F., TAPIA, J. M., & HERRERA - VIEDMA, E. (2018): A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON CONSENSUS MEASURES IN GROUP DECISION MAKING. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 33(8), 1624-1638.

DONG Q, COOPER O. (2016): A PEER-TO-PEER DYNAMIC ADAPTIVE CONSENSUS REACHING MODEL FOR THE GROUP AHP DECISION MAKING. European Journal of OR. 250(2):521–530.

DONG Q, SAATY TL (2014) AN ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS MODEL OF GROUP CON- SENSUS. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering 23(3):362–374.

DOUMPOS, M., & ZOPOUNIDIS, C. (2018): DISAGGREGATION APPROACHES FOR MULTICRITERIA CLASSIFICATION: AN OVERVIEW. In Preference Disaggregation in Multiple Criteria Decision.

FORMAN E., PENIWATI K. (1998): AGGREGATING INDIVIDUAL JUDGMENTS AND PRIORITIES WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS. European journal of operational research 108(1):165–169.

FRANCO LA. (2013): RETHINKING SOFT OR INTERVENTIONS: MODELS AS BOUNDARY OBJECTS. European Journal of Operational Research 231(3):720–733.

FRANCO LA., ROUWETTE EA., KORZILIUS H. (2016): DIFFERENT PATHS TO CONSENSUS? THE IMPACT OF NEED FOR CLOSURE ON MODEL-SUPPORTED GROUP CONFLICT MANAGEMENT. European Journal of Operational Research 249(3):878–889.

GOMES LFAM., GONZÁLEZ ARAYA MC., CARIGNANO C. (2004): TOMADA DE DECISOES EM CENARIOS COMPLEXOS: INTRODUCAO AOS MÉTODOS DISCRETOS DO APOIO MULTI-CRITERIO A DECISAO. Thomson.

HENAO F., FRANCO LA. (2016): UNPACKING MULTIMETHODOLOGY: IMPACTS OF A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INTERVENTION. European Journal of Operational Research 253(3):681–696.

JIAO L., PAN Q., LIANG Y., FENG X., YANG F. (2016): COMBINING SOURCES OF EVIDENCE WITH RELIABILITY AND IMPORTANCE FOR DECISION MAKING. Central European Journal of Operations Research 24(1):87–106.

KEENEY Y RAIFFA (1993): DECISIONS WITH MULTIPLE OBJECTIVES: PREFERENCES AND VALUE TRADE-OFFS. Cambridge university press.

KERSTEN, G. E. (1997): SUPPORT FOR GROUP DECISIONS AND NEGOTIATIONS AN OVERVIEW. In Multicriteria analysis (pp. 332-346). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

KÖKSALAN, M., MOUSSEAU, V., & ÖZPEYNIRCI, S. (2017): MULTI-CRITERIA SORTING WITH CATEGORY SIZE RESTRICTIONS. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making. sustainability science (pp. 137-161). Springer, Cham.

LÓPEZ, J. C. L., CARRILLO, P. A. Á., & VALENZUELA, O. A. (2018): A MULTICRITERIA GROUP DECISION MODEL FOR RANKING TECHNOLOGY PACKAGES IN AGRICULTURE. In Soft computing for sustainability science (pp. 137-161). Springer, Cham.

MONTIBELLER G., WINTERFELDT D. (2015): COGNITIVE AND MOTIVATIONAL BIASES IN DECISION AND RISK ANALYSIS. Risk Analysis 35(7):1230–1251.

RICHARDS GS., DUXBURY L. (2015): WORK GROUP KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION IN KNOWLEDGE INTENSIVE PUBLIC-SECTOR ORGANIZATIONS: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25(4):1247–1277.

SAATY, T. L. (2014): TOMA DE DECISIONES PARA LÍDERES. RWS Publications.

SHIH HS., SHYUR HJ., LEE ES. (2007): AN EXTENSION OF TOPSIS FOR GROUP DECISION MAKING. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 45(7):801–813.

SMETS P. (1991): VARIETIES OF IGNORANCE AND THE NEED FOR WELL-FOUNDED THEORIES. Information Sciences 57:135–144.

STAGGS SM., BONITO JA., ERVIN JN. (2018): MEASURING AND EVALUATING CONVERGENCE PROCESSES ACROSS A SERIES OF GROUP DISCUSSIONS. Group Decision & Negotiation 27(5):715–733.

TERVONEN T. (2014): JSMAA: OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE FOR SMAA COMPUTATIONS. International Journal of Systems Science 45(1):69–81.

ZANAZZI J.L. (2016): TOMA DE DECISIONES EN GRUPOS DE TRABAJO. EL MÉTODO PROCESOS DRV. PhD thesis, UNCórdoba.

ZHANG Q., LAI K.K., YEN J. (2019): MULTICRITERIA SUPPLIER SELECTION USING ACCEPTABILITY ANALYSIS. Advances in Mechanical Engineering 11(10):168–186.

Downloads

Published

2020-05-29

Issue

Section

Artículos Científicos

How to Cite

Método multicriterio cardinal de decisión en grupo con alternativas clasificadas por categorías. (2020). Revista De La Escuela De Perfeccionamiento En Investigación Operativa, 28(47). https://revistas.psi.unc.edu.ar/index.php/epio/article/view/28802