Discusión de la teoría económica y su aplicación en modelos multidisciplinarios energéticos

Parte 1: Introducción a los métodos de decisión difusos

Authors

  • Federico G. Camargo UTN – Facultad Regional La Roja, Facultad Regional de Concepción del Uruguay, Facultad Regional de Concordia – Argentina.
  • Esteban Sarroca UTN – Facultad Regional La Roja, Facultad Regional de Concepción del Uruguay, Facultad Regional de Concordia – Argentina.  
  • Omar Faure UTN – Facultad Regional La Roja, Facultad Regional de Concepción del Uruguay, Facultad Regional de Concordia – Argentina.  
  • Félix D.  Argañaraz UTN – Facultad Regional La Roja, Facultad Regional de Concepción del Uruguay, Facultad Regional de Concordia – Argentina.  
  • José A. Cabana UTN – Facultad Regional La Roja, Facultad Regional de Concepción del Uruguay, Facultad Regional de Concordia – Argentina.  
  • Claudio Karam UTN – Facultad Regional La Roja, Facultad Regional de Concepción del Uruguay, Facultad Regional de Concordia – Argentina.  
  • Gonzalo Sosa UTN – Facultad Regional La Roja, Facultad Regional de Concepción del Uruguay, Facultad Regional de Concordia – Argentina.  
  • Yolando R. Romero UTN – Facultad Regional La Roja, Facultad Regional de Concepción del Uruguay, Facultad Regional de Concordia – Argentina.  
  • Vicente Calbo UTN – Facultad Regional La Roja, Facultad Regional de Concepción del Uruguay, Facultad Regional de Concordia – Argentina.  
  • Eduardo A. Perez UTN – Facultad Regional La Roja, Facultad Regional de Concepción del Uruguay, Facultad Regional de Concordia – Argentina.  

Keywords:

multi-objective problem, fuzzy decision theory, externality, economic valuation, intrinsic value

Abstract

This paper deals with introductory aspects of fuzzy decision theory: law of supply and demand, market and its limitations (externalities) with the solutions proposed in theory and practice to solve them (tolls). Within these limitations (still under discussion), the concept of uncertainty is introduced, an aspect that hinders an optimal decision making of the participating individuals based on current economic theories that are based on the full certainty of the economic context. Therefore, decision theory and its extension to fuzzy decision theory, which is applicable in contexts of uncertainty, are introduced. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and its link with fuzzy decision models by means of exponential weights are presented. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to define a methodology for optimal evaluation, valuation and regulation, in contexts of fundamental uncertainty, determining the optimal reward or punishment, based on non-monetizable indexes (directly translatable to an equivalent economic cost). From there, an experimental index is defined, which is used in the present line of research, the Intrinsic Cost (IC).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amenta, P., Lucadamo, A., & Marcarelli, G. (2021). On the choice of weights for aggregating judgments in non-negotiable AHP group decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 288(1), 294-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.05.048

Aydin, C., & Esen, Ö. (2018). Reducing CO2 emissions in the EU member states: Do environmental taxes work? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61(13), 2396-2420.

Camargo, F. G. (2021a). Survey and calculation of the energy potential and solar, wind and biomass EROI: application to a case study in Argentina. DYNA, 88(219), 50-58. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v88n219.95569

Camargo, F. G. (2022b). Dynamic Modeling of The Energy Returned on Invested. DYNA, 89(221), 50-59.

Camargo, F. G. (2022c). Fuzzy multi-objective optimization of the energy transition towards renewable energies with a mixed methodology. Production, 32, e20210132. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20210132

Camargo, F. G. (2023d). A hybrid novel method to economically evaluate the carbon dioxide emissions in the productive chain of Argentina. Production, 33, e20210132. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20220053

Camargo, F. G. (2019e). Metodología regulatoria para propiciar la eficiencia energética desde el lado de la oferta en sistemas de distribución de energía eléctrica, 32, 1-330. Fundación Suyay. Recovered from http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12272/7010

Camargo, F. G., Casanova Pietroboni, C. A., Pérez, E., & Schweickardt, G. A. (2019). Metodología regulatoria para propiciar la eficiencia energética desde el lado de la oferta con penetración de fuentes primarias de energías renovables. Parte 1: Descripción y alcance del modelo de optimización. Recovered from https://ria.utn.edu.ar/handle/20.500.12272/5349.

Camargo, F. G., & Schweickardt, G. A. (2014). Estimación de la tasa de retorno energético: Análisis comparativo de las metodologías disponibles en la actualidad.https://publicaciones.ucuenca.edu.ec/ojs/index.php/maskana/article/view/575

Camargo, F. G., Schweickardt, G. A., & Casanova, C. A. (2018). Maps of Intrinsic Cost (IC) in reliability problems of medium voltage power distribution systems through a Fuzzy multi-objective model. Dyna, 85(204), 334-343. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v85n204.65836

Cavallaro, F., Danielis, R., Nocera, S., & Rotaris, L. (2018). Should BEVs be subsidized or taxed? A European perspective based on the economic value of CO2 emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 64, 70-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.07.017

Hao, Y., Tian, C., & Wu, C. (2020). Modelling of carbon price in two real carbon trading markets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118556

Ichihashi, S. (2021). The economics of data externalities. Journal of Economic Theory, 196, 105316.

Jeanne, O., & Korinek, A. (2019). Managing credit booms and busts: A Pigouvian taxation approach. Journal of Monetary Economics, 107, 2-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2018.12.005

Liu, Y., Eckert, C. M., & Earl, C. (2020). A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgements. Expert Systems with Applications, 161, 113738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113738

Maamoun, N. (2019). The Kyoto protocol: Empirical evidence of a hidden success. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 95, 227-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2019.04.001

Miyamoto, M., & Takeuchi, K. (2019). Climate agreement and technology diffusion: Impact of the Kyoto Protocol on international patent applications for renewable energy technologies. Energy policy, 129, 1331-1338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.053

Pradhan, B. K., & Ghosh, J. (2022). A computable general equilibrium (CGE) assessment of technological progress and carbon pricing in India's green energy transition via furthering its renewable capacity. Energy Economics, 106, 105788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105788

Robson, E. N., Wijayaratna, K. P., & Dixit, V. V. (2018). A review of computable general equilibrium models for transport and their applications in appraisal. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 116, 31-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.06.003

Saaty, T. L. (2003). Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary. European journal of operational research, 145(1), 85-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00227-8

Shahzadi, G., Akram, M., & Al-Kenani, A. N. (2020). Decision-making approach under Pythagorean fuzzy Yager weighted operators. Mathematics, 8(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8010070

Silajdzic, S., & Mehic, E. (2018). Do environmental taxes pay off? The impact of energy and transport taxes on CO2 emissions in transition economies. South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 13(2), 126-143. https://doi.org/10.2478/jeb-2018-0016

Simshauser, P. (2018). Price discrimination and the modes of failure in deregulated retail electricity markets. Energy Economics, 75, 54-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.08.007

Zadeh, Lotfi A.; FU, King- Zhang; Tanaka, Kokichi (ed.). (2014). Fuzzy sets and their applications to cognitive and decision processes: Proceedings of the us–japan seminar on fuzzy sets and their applications, held at the university of california, berkeley, california, July 1-4, 1974. Academic press.

Zhang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Carbon tax, tourism CO2 emissions and economic welfare. Annals of Tourism Research, 69, 18-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2017.12.009

Downloads

Published

2023-05-31

Issue

Section

Artículos Científicos

How to Cite

Discusión de la teoría económica y su aplicación en modelos multidisciplinarios energéticos : Parte 1: Introducción a los métodos de decisión difusos. (2023). Revista De La Escuela De Perfeccionamiento En Investigación Operativa, 31(53). https://revistas.psi.unc.edu.ar/index.php/epio/article/view/41269