The Wrath of God: knowledge, technology and social control in two contemporary TV series
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31056/2250.5415.v11.n1.32569Keywords:
Science and technology, Knowledge, Social control, Memory, Television, FictionAbstract
Based on the study of two contemporary mainstream TV series, we aim to analyze how massive cultural products showcase values and beliefs related to knowledge, science and technology. Through the comparative study between the first season of the TV series Westworld (2016) and the first season of The Handmaid’s Tale (2017), which explore dystopia and science fiction, it is possible to draw similarities amongst the android’s, the handmaid’s and our own –each time more– illusory realities, in which the dominant segments employ certain strategies based on the unequal distribution of knowledge and technology. The initial proposal is very similar: in both series, it is sought to recreate an artificial analogue world that apparently lacks high technologies. The fragile success of these artificial worlds depends on the fact that their manufacturing footprints are erased: the beings that inhabit these places are forced to forget their previous identities. We suggest that in both series the alternative worlds fail in the end because the oppressed segments manage to recover their memory and to regain the prerogative of knowledge. We put into practice, in this comparative study, theoretical and methodological tools from Anthropology, Social Science & Technology Studies (SSTS) and Literary Studies.
References
Bacon, F. (1620) (2000). Novum Organum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boyle, A. (2020). “They Should Have Never Given Us Uniforms If They Didn’t Want Us to Be an Army”: The Handmaid’s Tale as Transmedia Feminism. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 45(4), 845–870. https://doi.org/10.1086/707798
Busby, K., & Vun, D. (2010). Revisiting The Handmaid’s Tale: Feminist theory meets empirical research on surrogate mothers. Can. J. Fam. L., 26, 13.
Calvi, J. L., Rankin, A. M., Clauss, N., & Byrd-Craven, J. (2020). The nuanced psychology of The Handmaid’s Tale: Commentary on power, feminism, and the patriarchy from four feminist evolutionary psychologists. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 14(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000170
Cambra Badii, I., Paragis, M. P. y Mastandrea, P. (2019). El mandato del nacimiento. Cuestiones bioéticas y biopolíticas en la serie El cuento de la criada. Aesthethika, Número especial (marzo 2019), pp. 5-17.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2017). New romantic cyborgs: Romanticism, information technology, and the end of the machine. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Cuello, A. (2019). Modos de respuesta ante las relaciones de poder patriarcal. Efecto y desborde de la categoría discursiva de mujer en la República de Gilead. Aesthethika, marzo, 39–49.
Díaz Cruz, R. (2009). Al acecho de la perfección. Transhumanismo, el cuerpo oscuro y la vía religiosa de la tecnociencia. Antropología. Boletín Oficial del INAH, (87), 29-45.
Dick, P. K. (1987). ¿Sueñan los androides con ovejas eléctricas? Buenos Aires: Ediciones Orbis.
Dinello, D. (2018). The Wretched of Westworld: Scientific Totalitarianism and Revolutionary Violence. En South, J.B. y Engels, K. S. (eds.), Westworld and Philosophy: If You Go Looking for the Truth, Get the Whole Thing, 239–251.
Foucault, M. (1976). Vigilar y castigar [1975]. México: Siglo XXI.
Foucault, M. (1977). Historia de la sexualidad 1. La voluntad de poder. México: Siglo XXI.
Foucault, M. (1995). La verdad y las formas jurídicas. Barcelona: Gedisa,
Franklin, S. (1995) “Posmodern Procreation: A Cultural Account of Assited Reproduction”. En Ginsburg, Faye y Rapp, Rayna: Conceiving the New World Order, The Global Politics of Reproduction, University of California Press.
Haraway, Donna (1991). Ciencia, cyborgs y mujeres: La reinvención de la naturaleza. Madrid: Cátedra.
Hendershot, H. (2018). The Handmaid’s Tale as Ustopian Allegory: “Stars and Stripes Forever, Baby”. Film Quarterly, 72(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1525/fq.2018.72.1.13
Hirvonen, O. (2018). Westworld: From Androids to Persons. En South, J.B. y Engels, K. S. (eds.), Westworld and Philosophy: If You Go Looking for the Truth, Get the Whole Thing, 61–70.
Holladay, H., & Classen, C. (2019). The drip, drip, drip of dystopia: The Handmaid’s Tale, temporal boundaries, and affective investment. Feminist Media Studies, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2019.1678504
Jeffs, R., & Blackwood, G. (2017). Whose Real? Encountering New Frontiers in Westworld. MEDIANZ: Media Studies Journal of Aotearoa New Zealand, 16(2).
Kiejziewicz, A. (2017). Between technophobia and futuristic dreams: Visions of the possible technological development in Black Mirror and Westworld series. Maska, 2 (34). https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/43566
Lacko, I. (2017). On the path to sentience–post-digital narratives in “Westworld”. WORLD LITERATURE STUDIES, 9(3), 29-40.
Latour, B. (1993). Nunca hemos sido modernos. Madrid: Debate.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1986). El totemismo en la actualidad. 4ta edición. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Mauss, M. (2006). Manual de Etnografía. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica,
Miller, B. (2017). El cuento de la criada. Temporada 1 [serie de televisión]. USA: MGM.
Neuman, S. (2006). ‘Just a Backlash’: Margaret Atwood, Feminism, and The Handmaid’s Tale. University of Toronto Quarterly, 75(3), 857–868. https://doi.org/10.3138/utq.75.3.857
Nolan, Jonathan (2016). Westworld. Temporada 1 [serie de televisión]. USA: Jerry Weintraub Production / Warner Bros. / Bad Robot.
Ormart, E. (2019). Los bordes de un futuro distópico. La mujer gestante de la humanidad. Aesthethika, 19–26.
Ormart, E., y Paragis, M. P. (2019). Nuevas lecturas posibles sobre The Handmaid’s Tale desde una perspectiva ética. Aesthethika, 1–3.
Rabinow P. (1992). “Severing the ties: fragmentation and dignity in late modernity”. En Hess David & Layne, Linda (eds.) (1992) Knowledge and Society: The Anthropology of Science and Technology. Greenwich, Connecticut: Jai Press Inc.
Rapp, R. (2000). “Extra chromosomes and blue tulips: medico-familial interpretations”. En Lock, M.; Young A. y Cambrosio, A. (Ed.) Living and Working with New Medical Technologies: Intersections in Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roca, A. (2010) Fragmentos, fronteras y cuerpos incógnitos. Una mirada antropológica sobre la producción y criopreservación de vida en el laboratorio, Tesis doctoral. Buenos Aires: Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires. Disponible en: http://repositorio.filo.uba.ar/handle/filodigital/1331
Rosemary, J. (1981). Fantasy: The Literature of Subversion. London and New York: Routledge.
Salvadó-Corretger, G., & Benavente, F. (2019). Time to Dream, Time to Remember: Patterns of Time and Metaphysics in Westworld. Television & New Media. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419894947
Scott, R. (1982). Blade Runner. USA: Warner Bros. Pictures.
Sheldon, R. (2013) Somatic Capitalism: Reproduction, Futurity, and Feminist Science Fiction. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology, No.3. https://doi.org/10.7264/N3VX0DFT
South, J.B. y Engels, K. S. (2018). Westworld and philosophy: if you go looking for the truth, get the whole thing. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Spanakos, A. P. (2018). Violent Births: Fanon, Westworld, and Humanity. En South, J.B. y Engels, K. S. (eds.), Westworld and Philosophy: If You Go Looking for the Truth, Get the Whole Thing, 229–238.
Turner, V. (1999). La selva de los símbolos. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
Winckler, R. (2017). This great stage of androids: Westworld, Shakespeare and the world as stage. Journal of Adaptation in Film & Performance, 10(2), 169–188.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Los autores que publiquen en Ética y Cine Journal aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
Los autores/as conservan los derechos de autor © y permiten la publicación a Ética y Cine Journal, bajo licencia CC BY-SA / Reconocimiento - Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional. La adopción de esta licencia permite copiar, redistribuir, comunicar públicamente la obra, reconociendo los créditos de la misma, y construir sobre el material publicado, debiendo otorgar el crédito apropiado a través de un enlace a la licencia e indicando si se realizaron cambios.
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.
