Dance and metamorphosis: The choreographic politics of equality

Main Article Content

Juan Ignacio Vallejos

Abstract

The idea of metamorphosis has been present in many writings about dance, since Antiquity, and has been continued in various philosophical and aesthetic reflections. It relates to the conception and experience of a body that has no precise limits and experiences a synchronic identification with the world. Based on the critical analysis of philosophical concepts and choreographic works, this article argues that the relationship between dance and politics refers to the construction of choreographic politics of equality that theorize and experiment with new forms of common life. The protean body of dance exercises a practice capable of redefining that which today designates our conception of nature.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Vallejos, J. I. (2022). Dance and metamorphosis: The choreographic politics of equality. Heterotopías, 5(9), 1-21. https://revistas.psi.unc.edu.ar/index.php/heterotopias/article/view/38163
Section
Dossier
Author Biography

Juan Ignacio Vallejos, Universidad de Buenos Aires / Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas

Juan Ignacio Vallejos has a PhD in History and a Master in Social Sciences from the EHESS in Paris. He is an Adjunct Researcher at CONICET. His research revolves around the relationship between dance, performance and politics from a historical and critical theoretical approach. He also writes reviews of stage works for the magazine Otra Parte. He collaborated with several choreographers such as Dominque Brun, Fabián Gandini, Eugenia Estevez, Marina Sarmiento and Diana Szeinblum. He worked as a teacher at UBA, Nancy 2 University, EHESS and the Centre National de la Danse de France, and was a Mentor of the TGSM Action Lab in 2019. He has also been a guest lecturer at the University of Lille, Temple University, New York City University and New York University. He is coordinator of the Performing Arts Research Area of the Institute of Performing Arts at the UBA. His articles have been published in Dance Research Journal, Debate Feminista, Perspectives (INHA), Repères - Cahier de danse, Musicorum, Eadem Utraque Europa and Aisthesis, among others. He also edited and contributed to several collective works, including the Bloomsbury Companion to Dance Studies (2019). He translated and wrote the introductory study to Mark Franko's book "Dancing Modernism/Acting Politics" (2019).

How to Cite

Vallejos, J. I. (2022). Dance and metamorphosis: The choreographic politics of equality. Heterotopías, 5(9), 1-21. https://revistas.psi.unc.edu.ar/index.php/heterotopias/article/view/38163

References

Agamben, G. (2011). ¿Qué es un dispositivo? Sociológica, 73, 249-264.

Debord, G. (1992 [1967]). La société du spectacle. Paris: Gallimard.

Diderot, D. (1751). Lettre sur les sourds et muets: à l’usage de ceux qui entendent & qui parlent. s. l.

Elias, N. (2008). La société de cour. Paris: Flammarion.

Foucault, M. (1975). Surveiller et Punir. Paris: Gallimard.

Frantz, P. (1998). L’esthétique du tableau dans le théâtre du XVIIIe siècle. Paris: PUF.

Le Roy, X., Cramer, F. A., Y Manchev, B. (2009). La danse, la métamorphose du corps. Rue Descartes, (64), 96–103. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/40980713

Lepecki, A. (2012). Nove variações sobre coisas e performance. Revue Urdimento, 19, 93-99.

Lucien de Samosate. (1583). Les oeuvres de Lucian de Samosate. Paris: A. L’Angelier.

Ménestrier, C.-F. (1682). Des ballets anciens et modernes selon les règles du théâtre. Paris: Chez René Guignard.

Mondolfo, R. (2007). Heráclito. Textos y Problemas de su interpretación. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.

Muñoz, J. E. (2011). Introducción a la teoría de la desidentificación. En Taylor, D. y Fuentes, M. (Eds.) Estudios avanzados de performance (pp. 549-603). México: FCE.

Noverre, J.-G. (1760). Lettres sur la danse, et sur les ballets. Lyon: Chez Aimé Delaroche.

Perniola, M. (2004). The Sex Appeal of the Inorganic. London-New York: Bloomsbury.

Pure, M. de. (1668). Idée des spectacles anciennes et nouveaux. Paris: Michel Brunet.

Rancière, J. (1996). El desacuerdo: Política y filosofía. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.

Siegmund, G. (2003). El problema de la identidad en la danza contemporánea: del arte de la imitación al arte de la acción. En Conde-Salazar, J. y Sánchez, J. A. (Coord.) Cuerpos sobre blanco (pp. 51-62). Ciudad Real: Ediciones de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha.

Spanberg, M. (2017). Post-dance, An Advocacy. En Andersson, D.; Edvarsdsen, M. y Spanberg, M., Post-Dance. Estocolmo: MDT.

Vallejos, J. I. (2015). La técnica de las pasiones del ballet-pantomima: construcción de saberes sobre la danza durante los siglos XVII y XVIII. Cuadernos Dieciochistas, (15), 297–320. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.14201/cuadieci201415297320

Vallejos, J. I. (2019). El cuerpo proteico de la danza y su con-fusión con la naturaleza. Alegoría y representación en el ballet cortesano durante los siglos XVI y XVII. Eadem Utraque Europa, 20, 257-284.

Vallejos, J. I. (2019a). La ética proteica de la danza y su liminalidad. Ponencia presentada en las I Jornadas de Arte y Liminalidad. Poéticas y Políticas en Movimiento en el Instituto de Artes del Espectáculo, de la Facultad de Filosofía y Letras de la Universidad de Buenos Aires. Recuperado de http://eventosacademicos.filo.uba.ar/index.php/JAL/JAL/paper/viewFile/4960/3012