Propiedades psicométricas de un Cuestionario de Trolling en una muestra argentina

Barra lateral de artigos

PDF (Espanhol)
Publicado: Apr 24, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32348/1852.4206.v11.n1.20870
Palavras-chave:
propiedades, psicometría, cuestionario, Trolling

Conteúdo do artigo principal

Santiago Resett
Universidad Argentina de la Empresa. Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales. Departamento de Psicología
Pablo Gonzalez Caino
Universidad Argentina de la Empresa. Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales. Departamento de Psicología

Resumo

El Trolling es una conducta de suma relevancia psicosocial. Sin embargo, no existen en la Argentina estudios que hayan examinado las propiedades de instrumentos para evaluarlo. El objetivo del presente trabajo era examinar las propiedades del Cuestionario de Trolling de Buckels, Trapnell, y Paulhus (2014). Se constituyeron dos muestras, una de 437 sujetos y otra de 532 sujetos, ambas de Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires y Gran Buenos Aires. Un análisis factorial exploratorio –con la primera muestra- y uno confirmatorio –con la segunda- indicaron una estructura unifactorial e invarianza de medición. La consistencia interna era adecuada: ? de Cronbach = .74, mientras que la confiabilidad compuesta era .81. Se observó validez concurrente del cuestionario con el uso problemático de nuevas tecnologías y la personalidad oscura: maquiavelismo, narcisismo y psicotismo. En la discusión se analizan las implicancias de estos hallazgos.

Detalhes do artigo

Como Citar
Propiedades psicométricas de un Cuestionario de Trolling en una muestra argentina. (2019). Revista Argentina De Ciencias Del Comportamiento, 11(1), 48-57. https://doi.org/10.32348/1852.4206.v11.n1.20870
Edição
v. 11 n. 1 (2019): REVISTA ARGENTINA DE CIENCIAS DEL COMPORTAMIENTO
Seção
Artículos Metodológicos o Técnicos

Commons Attribution License, CCAL). Com esta licença, os autores conservam o direito de propriedade sobre artigos mas permitem que qualquer pessoa façam download e distribuam os artigos publicados na RACC sem necessidade da permissão do autor ou editor. Uma última condição é que sempre, e em todos os casos, o autor e a fonte original de publicação (p.e., RACC) sejam citados. Esta licença foi desenvolvido para facilitar o acesso aberto, gratuito e livre a trabalhos originais do arte e ciência.

Biografia do Autor

Santiago Resett, Universidad Argentina de la Empresa. Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales. Departamento de Psicología

Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas

Pablo Gonzalez Caino, Universidad Argentina de la Empresa. Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales. Departamento de Psicología

Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas

Como Citar

Propiedades psicométricas de un Cuestionario de Trolling en una muestra argentina. (2019). Revista Argentina De Ciencias Del Comportamiento, 11(1), 48-57. https://doi.org/10.32348/1852.4206.v11.n1.20870

Referências

Alonzo, M., & Aiken, M. (2004). Flaming in electronic communication. Decision Support Systems, 36(3), 205-213. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9236(02)00190-2

Bauman, S., Toomey, R. B., & Walker, J. L. (2013). Associations among bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide in high school students. Journal of Adolescence, 36(2), 341–350. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.12.001

Bentler, P. M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 400-404. doi: 10.1037/0033-2090.112.3.400

Boomsma, A., & Hoogland, J. J. (2001). The robustness of LISREL modeling revisited. En R. Cudeck, S. Du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.) Structural equation models: Present and future. A Festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog (139-168). Chicago: Scientific Software International.

Buckels, E. E., Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). Behavioral confirmation of everyday sadism. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2201–2209. doi: 10.1177/0956797613490749

Buckels, E. E., Trapnell, P., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Trolls just want to have fun. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 97-102. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.016

Byrne, B. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Nueva York: Routledge.

Byrne, B. (2012). Structural equation modeling with MPLUS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Nueva York: Routledge.

Chabrol, H., Leeuwen, N. V., Rodgers, R., & Séjourné, N. (2009). Contributions of psychopathic, narcissistic, Machiavellian, and sadistic personality traits to juvenile delinquency. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(7), 734–739. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.020

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural equation modeling, 9(2), 233- 255. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5

Craker, N., & March, E. (2016). The dark side of Facebook®: The Dark Tetrad, negative social potency, and trolling behaviours. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.043

Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the Internet. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.

DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Thousand Oak: Sage.

Dynel, M. (2016). “Trolling is not stupid”: Internet trolling as the art of deception serving entertainment’. Intercultural Pragmatics, 13(3), 353-381. doi: 10.1515/ip-2016-0015

Fletcher, A., Fitzgerald-Yau, N., Jones, R., Allen, E., Viner, R. M., & Bonell, C. (2014). Brief report: cyberbullying perpetration and its associations with socio-demographics, aggressive behaviour at school, and mental health outcomes. Journal of Adolescence, 37(8), 1393–1398. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.10.005

Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The Dark Triad of personality: A 10 year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(3), 199-216. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12018

Gámez-Guadix, M., Borrajo, E., & Almendros, C. (2016). Risky online behaviors among adolescents: Longitudinal relations among problematic Internet use, cyberbullying perpetration, and meeting strangers online. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 5(1), 100-107. doi: 10.1556/2006.5.2016.013

González Caino, P., & Resett, S. (agosto, 2017). Aplicación de un cuestionario de Trolling en una muestra argentina y diferencias de sexo y edad. Trabajo presentado en la XVI Reunión de la Asociación Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, San Luis, Argentina.

González Caino, P., & Resett, S. (mayo, 2018). Predicting trolling behavior from dark personality, problematic use of new technologies, and sex. Trabajo presentado en la Conferencia Anual de las Ciencias Psicológicas, San Francisco, Estados Unidos.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. Nueva York: Pearson.

Hardaker, C. (2010). Trolling in asynchronous computer mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions. Journal of Polit eness Research, 6(2), 215-242. doi: 10.1515/JPLR.2010.011

Hartung, C., Little, C. S., Allen, E. K., & Page, M. (2011). A psychometric comparison of two selfreport measures of bullying and victimization: Differences by sex and grade. School Mental Health, 3(1), 44-57. doi: 10.1007/s12310-010-9046-1

Herring, S. C., Job-Sluder, K., Scheckler, R., & Barab, S. (2002). Searching for Safety Online: Managing "Trolling" in a Feminist Forum. The Information Society, 18(5), 371-384. doi: 10.1080/01972240290108186

Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2010). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14(3), 206–221. doi:

10.1080/13811118.2010.494133

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118

Johnson, N., Cooper, R., & Chin, W. (2008). The effect of flaming on computer-mediated negotiations. European Journal of Information Systems 17(4), 417-434. doi: 10.1057/ejis.2008.22.

Johnson, N., Cooper, R., & Chin, W. (2009). Anger and flaming in computer-mediated negotiation among strangers. Decision Support Systems, 46(3), 660-672. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2008.10.008

Jones, D., & Paulhus, D. (2014). Introducing the short Dark Triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1), 28–41. doi: 10.1177/1073191113514105

Juvonen, J., & Gross, E. F. (2008). Extending the school grounds? — Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health, 78(9), 496?505. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00335.x

Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2006). Pruebas psicológicas: principios, aplicaciones y temas (6ta ed.). Madrid: International Thomson.

Kline, R. (2013). Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. En Y. M. Petscher, C. Schatschneider, & D. L. Compton (Eds.), Applied Quantitative Analysis in Education and the Social Sciences. Nueva York: Routledge.

Kline, R. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4ta ed.). Nueva York: Guilford.

Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073-1137. doi: 10.1037/a0035618

Lam-Figueroa, N., Contreras-Pulache, H., Mori-Quispe, E., Nizama-Valladolid, M., Gutiérrez, C., Hinostroza-Camposano, W., … HinostrozaCamposano, W. (2011). Adicción a internet: Desarrollo y validación de un instrumento en escolares adolescentes de Lima, Perú. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Publica, 28(3), 462-469. doi: 10.17843/rpmesp.2011.283.524

Lloret-Segura, S., Ferreres-Traver, A., HernándezBaeza, A., & Tomás-Marco, I. (2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 1151-1169. doi: 10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361

Loewenthal, K. M. (2001). An introduction to psychological tests and scales (2da ed.). Londres: Psychology Press.

Lopes, B., & Yu, H. (2017). Who do you troll and Why: An investigation into the relationship between the Dark Triad Personalities and online trolling behaviours towards popular and less popular Facebook profiles. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.036.

Mahon, J. (2007). A definition of deceiving. International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 21(2), 181–194. doi: 10.5840/ijap20072124

March, E., Grieve, R., Marrington, J., & Jonason, P. K. (2017). Trolling on Tinder® (and other dating apps): Examining the role of the Dark Tetrad and impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 139-143. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.025

Mehari, K. R., Farrell, A. D., & Le, A. H. (2014). Cyberbullying among adolescents: Measures in search of a construct. Psychology of Violence, 4(4), 399–415. doi: 10.1037/a0037521

Phillips, W. (2015). This is why we can’t have nice things: Mapping the relationship between online trolling and mainstream culture. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

Shachaf, P., & Hara, N. (2010). Beyond vandalism: Wikipedia trolls. Journal of Information Science, 36(3), 357-370. doi: 10.1177/0165551510365390

Sest, N., & March, E. (2017). Constructing the cybertroll: Psychopathy, sadism, and empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, 69-72. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.038

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.

Wong, D. S., Chan, H. C. O., & Cheng, C. H. (2014). Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among adolescents in Hong Kong. Children and Youth Services Review, 36, 133-140. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.11.006

Young, K. S. (2011). CBT-IA: The first treatment model for internet addiction. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 25(4), 304-312. doi: 10.1891/0889-8391.25.4.304

Zweig, J., Dank, M., Yahner, J., & Lachman, P. (2013). The rate of cyber dating abuse among teens and how it relates to other forms of teen dating violence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(7), 1063-1077. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-9922-8.