Análisis de la Escala de Bienestar Psicológico para Adultos usando el modelo de respuesta graduada
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
La Escala de Bienestar Psicológico para Adultos (BIEPS-A) fue propuesta como una medida multidimensional de bienestar psicológico. El presente estudio planteó la hipótesis de que la escala BIEPS-A es una medida esencialmente unidimensional y, por lo tanto, puede analizarse con modelos unidimensionales de la teoría de respuesta a los ítems. Examinamos datos de 1016 estudiantes universitarios peruanos (Medad = 20.56, 50 % mujeres) y encontramos apoyo para nuestra hipótesis de unidimensionalidad. Por lo tanto, el modelo de respuesta graduada se aplicó a los ítems de la escala BIEPS-A. Todos ellos funcionaron de manera aceptable solo a niveles bajos del constructo, mientras que se desempeñaron mal a niveles promedio y más altos de bienestar psicológico. Se discuten las implicaciones de estos hallazgos y también se ofrecen sugerencias para futuros desarrollos.
Detalhes do artigo
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Commons Attribution License, CCAL). Com esta licença, os autores conservam o direito de propriedade sobre artigos mas permitem que qualquer pessoa façam download e distribuam os artigos publicados na RACC sem necessidade da permissão do autor ou editor. Uma última condição é que sempre, e em todos os casos, o autor e a fonte original de publicação (p.e., RACC) sejam citados. Esta licença foi desenvolvido para facilitar o acesso aberto, gratuito e livre a trabalhos originais do arte e ciência.
Como Citar
Referências
Agenor, C., Conner, N. & Aroian, K. (2017). Flourishing: An evolutionary concept analysis. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 38(11), 915-923. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2017.1355945
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2a ed.). Nueva York, NY: Guilford Press.
Castro Solano, A. (2011). Las rutas de acceso al bienestar. Relaciones entre bienestar hedónico y eudaemónico. Un estudio en población argentina. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación – e Avaliação Psicológica, 1(31), 37-57.
Castro Solano, A., Brenlla, M. E., & Casullo, M. M. (2002). Evaluación del bienestar psicológico en adultos. En M. M. Casullo (Ed.), Evaluación del bienestar psicológico en Iberoamérica (pp. 93–100). Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Casullo, M. M. (2002). Evaluación del bienestar psicológico. En M. M. Casullo (Ed.), Evaluación del bienestar psicológico en Iberoamérica (pp. 11–29). Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Chalmers, R. P. (2012). mirt: A multidimensional item response theory package for the R environment. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(6), 1–29. doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i06
Crous, G. (2017). Child psychological well-being and its associations with material deprivation and type of home. Children and Youth Services Review, 80, 88–95. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.051
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Díaz, D., Rodríguez-Carvajal, R., Blanco, A., Moreno-Jiménez, B., Gallardo, I., Valle, C., & van Dierendonck, D. (2006). Adaptación española de las Escalas de Bienestar psicológico de Ryff. Psicothema, 18(3), 572–577.
Diener, E., Heintzelman, S.J., Kushlev, K., Tay, L., Wirtz, D., Lutes, L., & Oishi, S. (2017). Findings all psychologists should know from the new science on subjective well-being. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 58(2), 87–104. doi: 10.1037/cap0000063
Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156. doi: 10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
Dominguez-Lara, S. A. (2014). Análisis psicométrico de la Escala de Bienestar Psicológico para Adultos en estudiantes universitarios de Lima: un enfoque de ecuaciones estructurales. Psychologia, 8(1), 23–31. doi: 10.21500/19002386.1211
Dominguez-Lara, S. A., & Navarro-Loli, J. S. (2018). Revisión de metodologías empleadas en los estudios factoriales de la Escala de Bienestar Psicológico de Ryff (versión en español). Revista Evaluar, 18(2), 17–30. doi: 10.35670/1667-4545.v18.n2.20800
Dominguez-Lara, S. A., & Rodriguez, A. (2017). Índices estadísticos de modelos bifactor. Interacciones, 3(2), 59–65. doi: 10.24016/2017.v3n2.51
Edelen, M. O., & Reeve, B. B. (2007). Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Quality of Life Research, 16(S1), 5–18. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9198-0
Edwards, D., Burnard, P., Bennett, K., & Hebden, U. (2010). A longitudinal study of stress and self-esteem in student nurses. Nurse Education Today, 30(1), 78–84. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2009.06.008
Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Publishers.
Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis. Nueva York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Fard, T. R., Kalantarkousheh, M., & Faramarzi, M. (2018). Effects of mindfulness-based cognitive infertility stress therapy on psychological well-being of women with infertility. Middle East Fertility Society Journal, 23(4), 476–481. doi: 10.1016/j.mefs.2018.06.001
Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2017). Program FACTOR at 10: Origins, development and future directions. Psicothema, 29(2), 236–240. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2016.304
Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2018). Assessing the quality and appropriateness of factor solutions and factor score estimates in exploratory item factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78(5), 762–780. doi: 10.1177/0013164417719308
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5a ed.). Londres: SAGE.
Furr, R. M., & Bacharach, V. R. (2014). Psychometrics: An introduction. Londres: SAGE.
Gibbons, C. (2010). Stress, coping and burn-out in nursing students. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47(10), 1299–1309. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.02.015
Gibbons, C., Dempster, M., & Moutray, M. (2008). Stress and eutress in nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 61(3), 282–290. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04497.x
Haybron, D. M. (2008). Philosophy and the science of subjective well-being. En M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 17–43). Nueva York: The Guilford Press
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
Huppert, F. A., & So, T. T. (2013). Flourishing across Europe: Application of a new conceptual framework for defining well-being. Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 837–861. doi: 10.1007/s11205-011-9966-7
Huta, V., & Waterman, A. S. (2014). Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(6), 1425–1456. doi: 10.1007/s10902-013-9485-0
Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43(2), 207–222. doi: 10.2307/3090197
Lima-Castro, S., Peña-Contreras, E., Aguilar-Sizer, M., Bueno Pacheco, A., & Arias-Medina, P. (2019). Aproximación a un modelo de bienestar en adultos ecuatorianos. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación – e Avaliação Psicológica, 51(2), 5–18. doi: 10.21865/RIDEP51.2.01
Lloret-Segura, S., Ferreres-Traver, A., Hernández-Baeza, A., & Tomás-Marco, I. (2014). Exploratory Item Factor Analysis: A practical guide revised and updated. Anales de Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 30(3), 1151–1169. doi: 10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361
Maddux, J. E. (2002). Stopping the “madness”: Positive psychology and the deconstruction of the illness ideology and the DSM. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 13–25). Nueva York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Páramo, M. de los Á., Straniero, C. M., García, C. S., Torrecilla, N. M., & Gómez, E. E. (2012). Bienestar psicológico, estilos de personalidad y objetivos de vida en estudiantes universitarios. Pensamiento Psicológico, 10(1), 7–21.
Priesack, A., & Alcock, J. (2015). Well-being and self-efficacy in a sample of undergraduate nurse students: a small survey study. Nurse Education Today, 35(5), 16–20. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.01.022
Rasmussen, D. B. (1999). Human flourishing and the appeal to human nature. Social Philosophy & Policy, 16(1), 1–43. doi: 10.1017/S0265052500002235
Reise, S. P., Bonifay, W. E., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(2), 129–140. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.725437
Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016). Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods, 21(2), 137–150. doi: 10.1037/met0000045
Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
Ryff, C. D. (2018). Well-being with soul: science in pursuit of human potential. Perspective on Psychological Science, 13(2), 242–248. doi: 10.1177/1745691617699836
Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.69.4.719
Sagone, E., & De Caroli, M. E. (2014). Relationships between psychological well-being and resilience in middle and late adolescents. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 881–887. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.154
Samejima, F. (2016). Graded response models. En W. J. van der Linden (Ed.), Handbook of item response theory (pp. 123–136). doi: 10.1201/9781315374512-16
Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Positive psychology, positive prevention, and positive therapy. En C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 3–9). Nueva York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Nueva York, NY: Free Press
Springer, K. W., & Hauser, R. M. (2006). An assessment of the construct validity of Ryff’s scales of psychological well-being: Method, mode, and measurement effects. Social Science Research, 35(4), 1080–1102. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.07.004
Streiner, D. L., Norman, G. R., & Cairney, J. (2015). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stucky, B. D., Thissen, D., & Edelen, M. O. (2013). Using logistic approximations of marginal trace lines to develop short assessments. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37(1), 41–57. doi: 10.1177/0146621612462759
Sukhai, M. A., & Mohler, C. E. (2017). Mental health and well-being for students with disabilities in the sciences. In M. A. Sukhai & C. E. Mohler (Eds.), Creating a Culture of Accessibility in the Sciences (pp. 93–103). Toronto: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-804037-9.00008-5
ten Berge, J. M., & Kiers, H. A. (1991). A numerical approach to the approximate and the exact minimum rank of a covariance matrix. Psychometrika, 56(2), 309–315. doi: 10.1007/BF02294464
Vázquez C., & Hervás, G. (2009). Salud positiva: del síntoma al bienestar. En C. Vázquez y G. Hervás (Ed.), Psicología positiva aplicada (2a ed., pp. 17–40). Bilbao: Desclée De Brouwer.
Vittersø, J. (2016). The most important idea in the world: an introduction. En J. Vittersø (Ed.), Handbook of eudaimonic well-being (pp. 1–24). Cham, CH: Springer.
Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 678–691. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.678
Waterman, A. S. (2011). Eudaimonic identity theory: Identity as self-discovery. En S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, & V. L. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 357–379). Nueva York, NY: Springer
Waterman, A. S. (2013). Introduction: Considering the nature of a life well-lived—Intersections of positive psychology and eudaimonist philosophy. En A. S, Waterman (Ed.), The best within us: Positive psychology perspectives on eudaimonia (pp. 3–17). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Watson, R., Gardiner, E., Hogston, R., Gibson, H., Stimpson, A., Wrate, R., & Deary, I. (2009). A longitudinal study of stress and psychological distress in nurses and nursing students. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18(2), 270–278. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02555.x
Weier, M., & Lee, C. (2016). Stagnant or successful, carefree or anxious? Australian university students’ goals and beliefs about adulthood and their current well-being. Australian Psychologist, 51(6), 422–430. doi: 10.1111/ap.12169