Adaptación Argentina del Counterproductive Work Behavior Checklist - Short Version
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v24.n2.46473Palabras clave:
comportamiento laboral contraproducente, Tríada Oscura, engagement, satisfacción laboral, adaptaciónResumen
Los autores realizaron dos estudios. El objetivo del primero fue validar el Counterproductive Work Behavior Checklist - Short Version (CWB-C-10) para uso en investigación en Argentina. Contó con una muestra de 874 trabajadores/as (54.7% mujeres, 44.6% varones) activos/as de Argentina con una media de edad de 37.5 años (DE = 12.2). Los análisis efectuados permitieron confirmar la estructura unidimensional de la prueba. Asimismo, la consistencia interna mediante coeficiente alfa y omega resultó adecuada. El objetivo del segundo estudio fue identificar variables psicológicas y organizacionales (rasgos de personalidad de la Tríada Oscura, engagement, y satisfacción laboral) que permiten predecir el desarrollo de comportamiento laboral contraproducente. Contó con una muestra de 103 trabajadores/as (60.9% mujeres, 39.1% varones) activos/as de Argentina con una media de edad de 33 años (DE = 10.7). Como resultado, se observó que el rasgo maquiavelismo y el nivel de satisfacción laboral resultaron las variables de mayor poder predictor.
Descargas
Referencias
Álvarez-Escalante, J. C., Ruvalcaba-Coyaso, F. J., Romero de Loera, B. M., & Palacios-Montoya, J. C. (2021). Comportamiento antisocial en las organizaciones: Una revisión y análisis conceptual. Revista Digital Internacional de Psicología y Ciencia Social, 7(1), 23-41. https://doi.org/10.22402/j.rdipycs.unam.7.1.2021.330.23-41
Balzer, W. K., Kihm, J. A., Smith, P. C., Irwin, J. L., Bachiochi, P. D., Robie, C.,…Parra, L. F. (1997). User’s manual for the Job Descriptive Index (JDI; 1997 Revision) and the Job in General (JIG) Scales. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University.
Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (201 8). Factor analysis: Exploratory and confirmatory. In G. R. Hancock, M. L. Stapleton & R.O. Mueller (Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (pp. 98-122). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315755649
Barbaranelli, C., Fida, R., & Gualandri, M. (2013). Assessing counterproductive work behavior: A study on the dimensionality of CWB-Checklist. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 20(3), 235-248 . https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM20.3.3
Brassey, J., Coe, E., Dewhurst, M., Enomoto, K., Giarola, R., Herbig, B., & Jeffery, B. (May 27, 2022). Addressing employee burnout: Are you solving the right problem? McKinsey Health Institute. https://www.mckinsey.com
Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349-360. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.349
Bilal, A. R., Fatima, T., & Imran, M. K. (2020 ). Why ostracized full-time faculty should not be labeled as “low performer”? A qualitative insight from higher education in Pakistan. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12(5), 805-827. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-12-2018-0267
Blickle, G., & Schü tte, N. (2017). Trait psychopathy, task performance, and counterproductive work behavior directed toward the organization. Personality and Individual Differences, 109, 225-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.006
Bowling, N. A., & Michel, J. S. (2011). Why do you treat me badly? The role of attributions regarding the cause of abuse in subordinates’ responses to abusive supervision. Work & Stress, 25(4), 309-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2011.634281
Byrne, B. M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic concepts, application and programming (2nd Ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cameron, K. S., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2012). What is positive about positive organizational scholarship? In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 1-14). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734610.013.0001
Cameron, K. S., Bright, D., & Caza, A. (2004). Exploring the relationships between organizational virtuousness and performance. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 766-790. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764203260209
Chen, H., Richard, O. C, Boncoeur, O. D., & Ford, D. L. (2020). Work engagement, emotional exhaustion, and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Business Research, 114, 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.025
Chong, S., Huang, Y., & Chang, C. -H. (D.). (2020). Supporting interdependent telework employees: A moderated-mediation model linking daily COVID-19 task setbacks to next-day work withdrawal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105 (12), 1408- 1422. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000843
De Clercq, D., Haq, I. U., & Azeem, M. U. (2019). Why happy employees help: How meaningfulness, collectivism, and support transform job satisfaction into helping behaviours. Personnel Review, 48(4), 1001-1021. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2018-0052
DeShong, H. L., Grant, D. M., & Mullins-Sweatt, S. N. (2015). Comparing models of counterproductive workplace behaviors: The five-factor model and the dark triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 55-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.001
Fetzer, M., McNamara, J., & Geimer, J. (2017). Gamification, serious games and personnel selection. In H. Goldstein, E. Pulakos, J. Passmore & C. Semedo (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of the psychology of recruitment, selection and employee retention (pp. 293-309). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118972472.ch14
Filipkowski, J., & Derbis, R. (2020). The Dark Triad, goal achievement and work engagement as predictors of counterproductive work behaviors among IT employees. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 8(3), 197-210. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2020.100095
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 76-99). Sage.
Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1), 28-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113514105
Junça-Silva, A., & Silva, D. (2023). The buffering effect of micro-daily events on the relationship between the Dark Triad traits and counterproductive work behavior. Management Research Review, 46(5), 667-681. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-12-2021-0864
Kline, P. (2000). Handbook of psychological testing. Routledge.
Lebron, M., Tabak, F., Shkoler, O., & Rabenu, E. (2018). Counterproductive work behaviors toward organization and leader-member exchange: The mediating roles of emotional exhaustion and work engagement. Organization Management Journal, 15(4). https://scholarship.shu.edu/omj
Lupano-Perugini, M. L. (2017). Virtudes organizacionales, performance y satisfacción laboral. Diferencias según variables individuales y organizacionales en empleados argentinos. Psicodebate, 17(1), 35-50. http://doi.org/10.18682/pd.v17i1.637
Lupano-Perugini, M. L., de la Iglesia, G., Castro-Solano, A., & Fernández-Liporace, M. (2017). Validación de una escala sobre work engagement. Perfiles asociados a alta performance y satisfacción laboral. Ciencias Psicológicas, 11(2), 127-137. https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v11i2.1482
Malik, N. I., & Zahra, A. (2022). Impact of job engagement on counterproductive work behaviors: Moderating role of gender among organisational employees. Advances in Psychology and Behavioral Studies, 1(1), 1-8. http://www.metisjournals.com/index.php/apbs
Medrano, L. A., Ortiz, A., Flores-Kanter, P. E., Dominguez-Lara, S., & Gibelli, S. (2018). Medición de recursos personales socio-cognitivos en organizaciones: Análisis psicométricos en trabajadores argentinos. Revista Evaluar, 18(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v18.n2.20799
Mercado, B., Dilchert, S., Giordano, C., & Ones, D. (2018). Counterproductive work behaviors. In D. S. Ones, N. Anderson & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology (pp. 109-210). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473914940.n7
Miller, M. (2017). The influence of dark personality on counterproductive work behaviors. (Tesis de Maestría en Ciencias en Psicología Aplicada). University of Wisconsin-Stout, Wisconsin. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34488.96004
Moral de la Rubia, J. (2019). Revisión de los criterios para validez convergente estimada a través de la varianza media extraída. Psychologia. Avances de la Disciplina, 13(2), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.21500/19002386.4119
Morf, M., Feierabend, A., & Staffelbach, B. (2017). Variedad de tareas y comportamiento laboral contraproducente. Revista de Psicología Gerencial, 32(8), 581-592. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-02-2017-0048
Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2008). The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 392-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.392
O'Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the Dark Triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 557-579. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025679
Omar, A., Vaamonde, J., & Delgado, H. (2012). Comportamientos contraproducentes en el trabajo: Diseño y validación de una escala. Diversitas, 8(2), 249-265. https://doi.org/10.15332/s1794-9998.2012.0002.04
Ones, D. S., & Dilchert, S. (2013). Counterproductive work behaviors: Concepts, measurement, and nomological network. In K. F. Geisinger, B. A. Bracken, J. F. Carlson, J.-I. C. Hansen, N. R. Kuncel, S. P. Reise & M. C. Rodriguez (Eds.), APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology, Vol. 1. Test theory and testing and assessment in industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 643-659). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14047-035
Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Toward a taxonomy of dark personalities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(6), 421-426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414547737
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556-563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6
Pletzer, J. L. (2021). Why older employees engage in less counterproductive work behavior and in more organizational citizenship behavior: Examining the role of the HEXACO personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 173(1), 110550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110550
Rauf, K., & Farooq, A. (2014). Adaptation and validation of Counterproductive Work Behavior Checklist (45 and 32). International Journal of Novel Research in Humanity and Social Sciences, 1(1), 39-49. https://www.noveltyjournals.com/journal-details/IJNRHSS
Rehman, U., & Shahnawaz, G. (2018). Machiavellianism, job autonomy and counterproductive work behaviour among Indian managers. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 34(2), 83-88. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2018a10
Rial-Boubeta, A., Varela-Mallou, J., Abalo-Piñeiro, J., & Lévy-Mangin, J. P. (2006). El análisis factorial confirmatorio. In J. P. Lévy-Mangin & J. Varela (Eds.), Modelización con estructuras de covarianzas en ciencias sociales (pp. 119-143). Netbiblo.
Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555-572. https://doi.org/10.2307/256693
Rothbard, N., & Patil, S. (2012). Being there: Work engagement and positive organizational scholarship. In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 57-69 ). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734610.013.0005
Sackett, P. (2002). The structure of counterproductive work behaviors: Dimensionality and relationships with facets of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10(1-2), 5-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00189
Salanova, M., Llorens, S., Cifre, E., & Martínez, I. M. (2012). We need a Hero! Toward a validation of the Healthy and Resilient Organization (HERO) model. Group and Organization Management, 37(6), 785-822. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601112470405
Salessi, S., & Omar, A. (2018). Tríada oscura de personalidad, satisfacción laboral y cinismo organizacional: Un modelo estructural. Universitas Psychologica, 17(3), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy17-3.tops
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2016). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (4th Ed.). Routledge.
Selvarajan, T. T., Singh, B., Cloninger, P., & Misra, K. (2019). Work–Family conflict and counterproductive work behaviors: Moderating role of regulatory focus and mediating role of affect. Organisation Management Journal, 16(1), 42-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/15416518.2019.1574547
Spector, P. E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes and consequences. Sage.
Spector, P. (2001). Research methods in industrial and organizational psychology: Data collection and data analysis with special consideration to international issues. En P. Spector (Ed.), Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology - Volume 1: Personnel psychology (pp. 10-26). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608320.n2
Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105284955
Spector, P. E. (2022). Job satisfaction: From assessment to intervention. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003250616
Spector, P. E., Bauer, J. A., & Fox, S. (2010). Measurement artifacts in the assessment of counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior: Do we know what we think we know? Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 781-790. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019477
Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2002). An emotion-centered model of voluntary work behavior: Some parallels between counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 12(2), 269-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00049-9
Spector, P. E., Fox, S., Penney, L. M., Bruursema, K., Goh, A., & Kessler, S. (2006). The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 446-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.10.005
Stanek, K. C., Ones, D. S., & McGue, M. (2017). Counterproductive behaviors: Relations across life domains, etiology, and implications for applied practice. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 25(2), 111-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12164
Uysal, H. T., Ak, M., & Koşar, A. (2023). Counterproductive work behaviors in organizations: A research on the effect of the Dark Triad. AGATHOS, 14(1), 247-259. https://www.agathos-international-review.com/index.html
Vélez-Vega, A. (2022). Psychometric properties of the Office Gossip Scale in Puerto Rico. Revista Evaluar, 22(1), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v22.n1.37443
Woods, S., Ahmed, S., Nikolaou, I ., Costa, A., & Anderson, N. (2020). Personnel selection in the digital age: A review of validity and applicant reactions, and future research challenges. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(1), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1681401
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Revista Evaluar aplica la Licencia Internacional de Atribuciones Comunes Creativas (Creative Commons Attribution License, CCAL). Bajo esta licencia, los autores retienen la propiedad de copyright de los artículos pero permiten que, sin que medie permiso de autor o editor, cualquier persona descargue y distribuya los artículos publicados en Evaluar. La única condición es que siempre y en todos los casos se cite a los autores y a la fuente original de publicación (i.e. Evaluar). El envío de artículos a Evaluar y la lectura de los mismos es totalmente gratuito.
