ASSESSMENT OF DOCTOR-PATIENT RELATIONSHIP (DPR) IN A POPULATION IN SAN JUAN.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31052/1853.1180.v21.n3.17366Keywords:
Relationship, doctor, patient, hospital, public, privateAbstract
Abstract: The objective of this study was to inquire about the quality of Doctor-Patient Relationship (DPR) in patients in a town in the province of San Juan. A survey to patients about doctor-patient relationship was carried out in a private clinic and in a private hospital. Results: More than 70% of the contestants said they trust their doctor, their doctor see to them, helps them, makes an effort to help them, is approachable, it is possible to talk to, that they are happy with the prescribed treatment, that the treatment is helping them and it is beneficial to them, that they agree with the doctor on the causes of symptoms, and they say they feel better thanks to their doctor and consider they have more information about their health because of their doctor and that they have a better control of the symptoms even when they do not see the doctor. Contestants from the private clinic perceive that they can talk more to the doctor and find doctors more approachable than users of the public hospital. Discussion: In all the items of the questionnaire, more than 50% of patients refer to a good DPR.
Downloads
References
1. Rodríguez Arce, M. A. Relación Médico-Paciente. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 2008.
2. Díaz Muñoz, K. Relación entre la satisfacción del usuario y la calidad de la comunicación médico-paciente en el Centro de Salud de Conocoto. (Tesis para optar por el título de Diplomado de Gerencia y Calidad en servicios de Salud). Quito, Ecuador. Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja; 2011.
3. Artacho, J.. Relación médico paciente y subjetividad. Guía de Aprendizaje - Crecimiento y Desarrollo. 2013; 1(10): 641-48.
4. Mingote Adán, J.C., Moreno-Jiménez, B., Rodríguez-Carvajal, R., Gálvez Herrer, M., Ruíz López, P. Validación psicométrica de la versión española del Cuestionario de Relaciones Médico-Paciente (CREM-P). Actas Españolas de Psiquiatría. 2008; 36:0-00.
5. Barca Fernández, I., Parejo Miguez, R., Gutiérrez Martín, P., Fernández Alarcón,F., Alejandre Lázaro, G. y López de Castro, F. La información al paciente y su participación en la toma de decisiones clínicas.Aten Primaria. 2003; 33 (7):361-7.
6. Outomuro, D. y Actis, A. M..Estimación del tiempo de consulta ambulatoria en clínica médica. Rev. méd. Chile, 141, N° 3.[revista en internet]2013. Marzo. [acceso 2 de Mayo de 2017].Disponibleen:http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872013000300012
7. Lin, C. T., Albertson, G. A., Schilling, L. M., Cyran, E. M., Anderson, S. N. y Ware, L. Is patients' perception of time spent with the physician a determinant of ambulatory patient satisfaction?ArchInternMed.2001; 16: 1437-42.
8. Ortiz Espinosa, R. M., Muñoz Juárez, S., Martín del Campo, D. L. y Torres Carreño, E. Consulta externa en instituciones de Salud de Hidalgo, México, según la opinión de los usuarios. Pan Am J Public Health. 2003; 13(4): 229-38.
9. Sauceda Valenzuela, A.L., Wirtz, V. J., Santa Ana Tellez, Y., y Kageyama Escobar, M. L. Ambulatory health service users' experience of waiting time and expenditure and factors associated with the perception of low quality of care in México. BMC HealthServicesResearch. 2010; 10: 178-188.
10. Badia, X. y Lizán L. Reflexiones sobre la investigación de resultados en salud. Aten Primaria. 2002; 30: 388-91.
11. Herdman M. y Badia X. La medida de la satisfacción con el tratamiento en la Investigación de Resultados en Salud. En: Badia X. La investigación en resultados en salud.Barcelona: Edimac; 2000. p. 79-93.
12. Ruiz, M.A., Pardo, A., Rejas, J., Soto. J., Villasante, F. y Aranguren, J.L. Development and Validation of the “Treatment Satisfaction with Medicines
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Escuela de Salud Pública y Ambiente. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the work to be copied, distributed, exhibited and interpreted as long as it is not done for commercial purposes.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after the publication process. (See The Effect of Open Access). (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
