Tax Reform in Argentina: Some necessary previous definitions

Authors

  • Ricardo Bara Universidad Nacional del Sur

Keywords:

Tax System, Tax Reform, Argentina

Abstract

There is general acceptance that our current tax “system” has serious drawbacks. But there are also notable differences regarding which are the advisable reforms. To sort the approach to the subject matter, the basic regulatory criteria in which any proposal of a new advisable tax system rests are set out, derived from the academic literature on Public Finance and the practical experience of other nations. Fiscal relations are a part of the rules, rights and faculties of each of the sectors, established in the institutional system that defines the National Constitution. Recent progress in the political economy and the institutional economy have produced important results for the understanding of the interrelations in the economic and institutional systems, and they are applicable to the tax system. The work seeks to incorporate these new contributions to derive regulatory criteria. On the other hand, a tax reform is a complex phenomenon. This is a change on an existent system that has to continue working with important effects on the transition. A tax reform is an institutional change of significant importance. This advises to define matters such as the political-economical system where the institutional reform and order will be applied, which will rule the relationship between the taxpayer citizen and the treasury, the scope of the use of power, the relationship between rules and discretion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acemoglu, D. (2007). “Is Democracy the best Setting for Strong Economic Growth?”, The Wall Street Jorunal, marzo 13.

Acemoglu, D., Johnson S. y Robinson J. (2005). “Institutions as Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth”, en Aghion y Durlauf (eds): Handbook of Economic Growth, North Hollanda, Amsterdam.

Acemoglu, D. y Robinson J. (2012). Why Nations Fail, Profile Books Ltd, Londres.

Alberdi, J. B. (1854). Sistema Económico y Rentístico de la Confederación Argentina según la Constitución de 1853. re-edición Emecé, Buenos Aires, 2010

Aligica, P. y Tarko V. (2012). “State capitalism and the rent-seeking conjecture”, Constitutional Political Economy, 23(4), diciembre.

Alonso, J. A. y Garcimartín, C. (2013). ”The Determinants Of Institutional Quality. More On The Debate”. Journal of International Development, vol. 25(2), pp. 206-226.

Arrow, K.(1951). Social Choice and Individual Values, Wiley, Nueva York.

Auerbach, A. (1996). “Measuring the Impact of Tax Reform”, National Tax Journal, Vol.49, nº 4, diciembre.

Bara, R.(2006). Finanzas Públicas y Decisiones Públicas, Fondo Editorial del CPCE-CABA, Buenos Aires.

Becker, G. (1991). “A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 98(3), pp. 371-400.

Boadway, R. y Wildasin D. (1984). Public Secotr Economics, p. 17. Hay traducción al castellano publicada por el Instituto de Estudios Fiscales, Madrid, 1986.

Bjornslov, C. (2015). “Constitutional property rights protección and economic growth”, Constitutional Political Economiy, 26, septiembre.

Bremmer, I. (2009). “State capitalism comes of age”, Foreing Affairs, 88(3).

Buchanan, J. (1960). “La Scienza delle Finanze: The Italian Tradition in Fiscal Theory”, en Fiscal Theory and Political Economy, The University of North Caroline Press.

Buchanan, J. (1965). The Public Finance, Richard Irwin Inc, Homewood, Illinois. Versión en castellano publicada por la Editorial de Derecho Financiero, Madrid.

Buchanan, J. (1979). “Political without Romanticism”, conferencia pronunciada en el Institute for Advanced Studies, Viena. Hay traducción al castellano publicada en El Análisis Económico de la Política, Instituto de Estudios Económicos, Madrid, 1986.

Buchanan J. (1986). La Constitución de la Política Económica, Lectura en ocasión de recibir el Premio Nobel de Economía. Versión en castellano publicada por Papeles de Economía Española, nº 30-31, Madrid.

Buchanan, J. y Brennan G. (1985). The Reason of Rules, Cambridge University Press,

Buchanan, J. y Musgrave R. (2000). Public Finance and Public Choice, MIT Press

Coase, R. (1984). “The New Institutional Economics”, Jorunal of Institutional and Theorethical Economics, 140.

Cortés Conde, R. (1997). La Economía Argentina en el Largo Plazo, Sudamericana, Buenos Aires.

Cosciani, C. (1960). Principios de Ciencia de la Hacienda, Editorial de Derecho Financiero, Madrid.

De Viti de Marco, A. (1934). Principios Fundamentales de Economía Financiera, Editorial Revista de Derecho Privado, Madrid.

Downs, A. (1973). Teoría Económica de la Democracia, Aguilar, Madrid.

FIEL (1987). El Gasto Público en la Argentina 1960-1985, Buenos Aires.

Fuentes, J. A. (2012). “Hacia pactos fiscales en América Latina: entre la reciprocidad y la confrontación”, en CEPAL-CIDOB (2012): Reforma Fiscal para América Latina, Chile.

Gibbard, A. (1973). “Manipulation of voting schemes: A general result”, Econometrica, 41.

Haggard y Tiede (2011). “The rule of law and economic growth. Where are we?”, World Development, 39

Harberger, A. (1995). Monetary and Fiscal Policy for Equitable Economic Growth, FMI, Washington.

Hettich, W. y Winer S. (1999). Democratic Choice and Taxation, Cambridge University Press

Hirschleifer, J. (1994). “The Dark Side of the Force”, Economic Inquiry, 32.

Lerda, J. C. (1996). “El componente implícito de la política cuasi-fiscal o la policía fiscal implícita”, VIII Seminario de Política Fiscal, CEPAL, Santiago de Chile.

Moore, M.(2008).“Between coercion and contract: competing narratives on taxation and governance”. En Taxation and State-Building in Developing Countries. Capacity and Consent, Brätigam, Fjeldstad y Moore (eds), Cambridge University Press. University Press.

North, D. (2005). Understanding the Process of Economics Change, Princeton University Press.

Olson, M. (2000). Power and Prosperity, Basic Books, New York. Hay traducción al castellano: Poder y Prosperidad (2001), Siglo XXI de Argentina Editores, Buenos Aires.

Posner, R. (1971). “Taxation by Regulation”, The Bell Journal of Economics and Manangement Science., 2(1).

Satterwhaite, M. (1975). ”Strategy-proofness and Arrows Conditions: Existence and Correspondence Theorems for Voting Procedures and Social Welfare Functions”. Journal of Economic Theory, 10.

Schumpeter, J. (1918). “Die Krise des Steuarstaats”, Graz y Leipzig. Versión en castellano: “La crisis del estado fiscal”, en Juan Francisco Corona (compilador) Lecturas de Hacienda Pública, Minerva Ediciones, Madrid, 1994.

Schumpeter, J. (1952). Capitalismo, Socialismo y Democracia, Aguilar, Madrid. La versión original en ingles se publicó en 1942.

Weingast, B., Shepsle K. y Johnsen C. (1981). “The Political Economy of Benefits and Costs”, Journal of Political Economy, vol.89, nº 4.

Wicksell, K. (1896). The New Principle of Just Taxation. Traducción al inglés de James Buchanan del original Ein neuesder gerechten Besteuerung, Finanztheoretische Untersuchungen, Jena. Publicado en Musgrave, Richard y Alan Peacock (eds): Classics in the Theory of Public Finance, Macmillan, Londres, 1958

Wittman, D. (1995). The Myth of Democratic Failure, The University of Chicago Press.

Downloads

Published

2015-11-22

How to Cite

Tax Reform in Argentina: Some necessary previous definitions. (2015). Actualidad Económica, 25(86), 5-29. https://revistas.psi.unc.edu.ar/index.php/acteconomica/article/view/12796