Animal concepts: psychological theories, pluralism and division of labor

Article Sidebar

pdf (Spanish)
Published: May 10, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32348/1852.4206.v3.n1.5229
Keywords:
concepts, animal cognition, concept possession, mental representarions, conceptual abilities

Main Article Content

Mariela Aguilera
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Psicología

Abstract

Charter and Heyes (1994) claim that the idea of animal concepts has no sense since it cannot fit with any of the current psychological theories of concepts (prototype, exemplar and definitional theories). But, as I claim, the problem of animal concepts is related to the problem of conditions of concept possession, which has been widely studied by philosophical theories. Psychological theories of concepts have focused on the nature of concepts; so they are inadequate for answering such problem. Nevertheless, it does not mean the labors of both disciplines must be unrelated. Instead, by adopting pluralism about concepts –inspired by recent empirical research on psychology of concepts– it is possible to articulate both disciplines. Besides, some methodological consequence on psychology of concepts should follow from the debate on animal concepts.

Article Details

How to Cite
Animal concepts: psychological theories, pluralism and division of labor. (2011). Argentinean Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 3(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.32348/1852.4206.v3.n1.5229
Issue
Vol 3, No 1 (2011): Special Issue: "Intentionality and Conscience: Recent Approaches"
Section
Intencionalidad y Conciencia: Abordajes Recientes

La RACC aplicará la licencia internacional de atribuciones comunes creativas (Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Bajo esta licencia, se permite cualquier explotación de la obra, incluyendo la explotación con fines comerciales y la creación de obras derivadas, la distribución de las cuales también está permitida sin ninguna restricción. Esta licencia es una licencia libre según la Freedom Defined. La única condición es que siempre y en todos los casos se cite a los autores y a la fuente original de publicación (i.e., RACC). Esta licencia fue desarrollada para facilitar el acceso abierto, gratuito y libre a trabajos originales científicos y artísticos.

Author Biography

Mariela Aguilera, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Psicología

Facultad de psicología. Problemas epistemológicos de la psicología contemporánea. Profesora asistente

How to Cite

Animal concepts: psychological theories, pluralism and division of labor. (2011). Argentinean Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 3(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.32348/1852.4206.v3.n1.5229

References

Bermúdez, J. (1998). The Paradox of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Boesch, C. & H. Boesch (1984). Mental map in wild Chimpanzees: an analysis of hammer transports for nut cracking. Primates, 25, 160-170.

Boesch, C. & H. Boesch (1990). Tool use and tool making in wild Chimpanzees. Folia Primatologica, 54, 86-99.

Byrne, R. y A. Whiten (Eds.) (1988). Machiavellian Intelligence, Clarendon Press: Oxford.

Call, J., (2006). Descartes’ two errors: Reason and reflection in the great apes. En S. Hurley y M. Nudds (Eds.), Rational Animals? New York: Oxford University Press.

Call, J., (2006a). Inferences by exclusion in the great apes: the effect of age and species. Animal Cognition, 9, 393-403.

Call, J. (2004), Inferences about the Location of Food in the Great Apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, and Pongo pygmaeus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 118, 232–241.

Camp, E. (2009). Putting Thoughts to Work Concepts, Systematicity, and Stimulus-Independence. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 78, 275-311.

Carruthers, P. (2009). Invertebrate concepts confront the generality Constraint (and win). En R. Lurz (Ed.), The Philosophy of Animal Minds (pp. 89-107). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Charter, N. y C. Heyes (1994). Animal concepts content and discontent. Mind and Language, 9, 209–246.

Cheney, D. y R. Seyfarth (1990). How Monkeys See The Word. London: University of Chicago Press.

Cheney, D. y R. Seyfarth (2007). Baboon Metaphysics. The Evolution of a Social Mind. London: University Of Chicago Press.

Davidson, D. (1985). Rational animals. En E. LePore & B. McLaughlin (Eds.). Actions and Events (pp. 473-479). Oxford: Blackwell.

Davidson, D. (1999). The Emergence of Thought. Erkenntnis, 51, 7-17.

Dennett, D. (1987). La actitud intencional. Barcelona: Gedisa.

De Waal, F. (1996). Bien natural. Herder, Barcelona. Duhau, L. (2010). Do bees really have concepts? Theorema, 29, 125-134.

Evans, G. (1982). The varieties of reference. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press.

Fodor: (2004). Having concepts: a brief refutation of the twentieth century. Mind and Language, 19, 29-47.

Fodor, J. (1998a). Conceptos: donde la ciencia cognitiva se equivocó. Barcelona: Gedisa.

Fodor, J. (1998b). In Critical Condition. Cambridge: MIT Press, Cambridge.

Glock, H. J. (2000). Animal, Thoughts and Concepts. Synthese, 123, 35-64.

Glock, H. J. (2006) Concepts Representations or Abilities. En E. Di Nucci and C. McHugh (Eds.). Content, consciousness, and perception. Essays on contemporary philosophy of mind (37-61). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.

Glock, H. J. (2009). Can Animals Act For Reasons? Inquiry, 52, 1-43.

Hernstein, R.; D. Loveland y C. Cable (1976). Natural concepts in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 385-302.

Margolis, E. y S. Laurence (1999). Concepts: core readings. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Millikan, R. (2000). On clear and confused ideas an essay about substance concepts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Murphy, G. L. (2002). The big book of concepts. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Newen, A. & A. Bartels, (2007). Animal minds and the possession of concepts. Philosophical Psychology, 20, 283–308.

Peacocke Ch. (1992). A study of concepts. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Prinz, J. & A. Clark (2004). Putting concepts to work: some thoughts for the twenty-first century. Mind and Language, 19, 57–69.

Tomasello, M. (1999). Los orígenes culturales de la cognición humana. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.

Vauclair, J. (1996) Animal Cognition Recent Developments in Comparative Psychology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Machery, E. (2009). Doing without concepts. Oxford: University Press.

Prinz, J. 2002, Furnishing the mind: concepts and their perceptual basis. Cambridge: The MIT Press Cambridge.

Prinz, J. & A. Clark (2004). Putting concepts to work: some thoughts for the twenty-first century. Mind and Language, 19, 57–69.

Weiskopf, D. A. (2009). The plurality of concepts. Synthese, 169, 145–173.

Weiskopf, D. A. (2010). The theoretical indispensability of concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 228-229.

Whiten, A. & Byrne, R. W. (1997). Machiavellian Intelligence II: Extensions and Evaluations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.