Evaluation of equations using cystatin C for estimation of the glomerular filtration rate in healthy adult population of canidates for kidney donors.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31053/1853.0605.v74.n3.14814Keywords:
cystatin C, estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate, kidney donorsAbstract
The determination of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is critical for the selection of potential kidney donors. Methods of measurement of GFR are impractical and complex, which led to development of equations to estimate GFR. Objective: To evaluate of the performance of Creatinine and Cystatin C based equation for estimation of GFR in healthy adult population of candidates for kidney donors. Materials and Methods: a cross-sectional study was performed in 72 adult patients evaluated as candidates for kidney donors. GFR was measured by nonradiolabeled Iothalamate clearence (mGFR). GFR was estimated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (eGFR MDRD) equation, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration study (eGFR CKD-EPICREAT, eGFR CKD-EPI-CREAT+CYSC) and the equation proposed by Stevens et al. (STEVENSCREAT+CYSC). The overall performance of all equations was analyzed. Results: eGFR CKD-EPICREAT+CYSC, eGFR STEVENS CREAT+CYSC and eGFR CKD-EPI-CREAT presented lower bias (1,93; - 0,71; -1,53 mL/ min/1,73m2 respectively) compared with eGFR MDRD (bias= -10,36 mL/min/1.73m2). This study demonstrated that the best diagnostic performance was shown by eGFR CKD-EPICREAT+CYSC (LR(+)=9,8; “Positive Likelihood Ratios”), followed by eGFR STEVENSCREAT+CYSC (LR(+)=4,7) and eGFR CKD-EPICREAT (LR(+)=3,7). Discussion: CKD-EPICREAT+CYSC, STEVENS-CREAT+CYSC and CKDEPI-CREAT equations demonstrated a clearly higher performance to estimate GFR compared with MDRD in the study population.Downloads
References
1. Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative (K/DOQI). Clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 39: S76-S110.
2. Gozdowska J, Urbanowicz A, Sadowska A et al. Glomerular filtration rate estimation in prospective living kidney donors: preliminary study. Transplantation proceedings 2014; 46: 2592-2597.
3. Luján P, Chiurchiu C, Douthat W et al. Ckd-epi instead of mdrd for candidates to kidney donation. Transplantation 2012; 94: 637-641.
4. Sandllands E, Dhaun N, Dear J et al. Measurement of renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2013; 76: 504-515.
5. Dharnidharka V, Kwon C and Stevens G. Serum cystatin c is superior to serum creatinine as a marker of kidney function: a meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 40: 221-226.
6. Fernández García M, Coll E, Ventura Pedret S et al. Cistatina c en la evaluación de la función renal. Rev Lab Clin 2011; 4: 50-62.
7. Van Rossum L, Zietse R, Vulto A et al. Renal extraction of cystatin c vs 125I-iothalamate in hypertensive patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006; 21: 1253-1256.
8. Alles A, Fraga A, García R et al. Detección precoz de enfermedad renal crónica. Acta Bioquím Clín Latinoam 2010; 44: 377-384.
9. Levey A, Coresh J, Greene T et al. Expressing the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate with standarized serum creatinine values. Clin Chem 2007; 53: 766-772.
10. Levey A, Stevens L, Schmid C et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 2009; 150: 604-612.
11. Simonsen O, Grubb A and Thysell H. The blood serum concentration of cystatin c (gamma-trace) as a measure of the glomerular filtration rate. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1985; 45: 97-101.
12. Newman D. Cystatin c. Ann Clin Biochem 2002; 39: 89-104.
13. Bouvet Y, Bouissou F, Coulais Y et al. Gfr is better estimated by considering both serum cystatin c and creatinine levels. Pediatr Nephrol 2006; 21: 1299-1306.
14. Sterner G, Björk J, Carlson J et al. Validation of new plasma cystatin c - based formula and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease creatinine - based formula for determination of glomerular filtration rate. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2009: 43: 242-249.
15. Hoek F, Kemperman F and Krediet R. A comparison between cystatin c, plasma creatinine and the cockcroft and gault formula for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003; 18: 2024-2031.
16. Herget-Rosenthal S, Bökenkamp A and Hofmann W. How to estímate gfr-serum creatinine, serum cystatin c or equations?. Clin Biochem 2007; 40: 153-161.
17. Filler G and Lepage N. Should the schwartz formula for estimation of gfr be replaced by cystatin c formula?. Pediatr Nephrol 2003; 18: 981-985.
18. Stevens L, Coresh J, Schmid C et al. Estimating gfr using serum cystatin c alone and in combination with serum creatinine: a pooled analysis of 3418 individuals with ckd. Am J Kidney Dis 2008; 51: 395-406.
19. Larsson A, Malm J, Grubb A et al. Calculation of glomerular filtration rate expressed in ml/min from plasma cystatin c values in mg/L. Scand J Clin Invest 2004; 64: 25-30.
20. Inker L, Schmid C, Tighiouart H et al. Estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin c. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 20-29.
21. Chiurchiu C, Garcés N, Garay G et al. Utilidad de las ecuaciones basadas en la concentración sérica de cistatina c en el estudio de la función renal. Medicina 2007; 67: 136-142.
22. Mahmoud O, Wael A, Gamal A et al. Evaluation of serum cystatin c as a marker of early renal impairment in patients with liver cirrosis. International J Hepatol 2015; 2015: 1-8.
23. Krones E, Fickert P, Zitta S et al. The chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration equation combining creatinine and cystatin c accurately assesses renal function in patients with cirrosis. BioMed Central Nephrol 2015; 16: 196.
24. Momtaz H, Dehghan A and Karimian M. Correlation of cystatin c and creatinine based estimates of renal function in children with hydronephrosis. J Renal Inj Prev 2016; 5:25-28.
25. Satirapoj B, Jirawatsiwaporn K, Tangwonglert T et al. Performance of the estimated glomerular filtration rate creatinine and cystatin c based equations in Thai patients with chronic glomerulonephritis. Int J Nephrol Renovas Disease 2015; 8: 145-150.
26. Bland J, Altman D. Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 1995; 346: 1085-1087.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The generation of derivative works is allowed as long as it is not done for commercial purposes. The original work may not be used for commercial purposes.